Show simple item record

Digit memory in Chinese and English: Evidence for a temporally limited store

dc.contributor.authorStigler, James W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, Shin-yingen_US
dc.contributor.authorStevenson, Harold W.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-07T19:29:57Z
dc.date.available2006-04-07T19:29:57Z
dc.date.issued1986-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationStigler, James W., Lee, Shin-Ying, Stevenson, Harold W. (1986/06)."Digit memory in Chinese and English: Evidence for a temporally limited store." Cognition 23(1): 1-20. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/26140>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T24-49PJYMC-5/2/aa17dd141105e863bb70a42327837813en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/26140
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=3742988&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper describes 3 studies comparing short-term memory for digits between native speakers of Chinese and of English. The first study documents, with large samples of kindergarten, first-, and second-grade children, a Chinese advantage in memory for digits. The Chinese subjects, at all grade levels, remembered at least 2 more digits, on average, than did American or Japanese subjects. The second study compared digit memory of 6- and 7-year-old children, Chinese and American, under forward, backward and grouped conditions. The provision of a grouping strategy helped both Chinese and American subjects equally, which fails to support strategy use as the primary explanation of digit memory differences. Further, Chinese children performed more poorly than American children on the backward span. The final study, carried out on Chinese and American university students, investigated differences in pronunciation duration of Chinese and English number words as a possible explanation of span differences. Chinese number words were found to be of significantly shorter pronunciation duration than English number words; and total pronunciation duration for a subject's maximum span did not differ between Chinese and Americans. These findings provide evidence for a temporally limited store.en_US
dc.format.extent1242877 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleDigit memory in Chinese and English: Evidence for a temporally limited storeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Chicago, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid3742988en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/26140/1/0000216.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(86)90051-Xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceCognitionen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.