View Item 

Show simple item record

A comparison of bribery and bidding in thin markets

dc.contributor.authorBeck, Paul J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMaher, Michael W.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-07T19:35:58Z
dc.date.available2006-04-07T19:35:58Z
dc.date.issued1986en_US
dc.identifier.citationBeck, Paul J., Maher, Michael W. (1986)."A comparison of bribery and bidding in thin markets." Economics Letters 20(1): 1-5. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/26307>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V84-4590W1N-NS/2/30f5c66d6d7d0a97894a36eb0ddf1b7den_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/26307
dc.description.abstractThis paper compares bribery to competitive bidding in a government purchasing context. While competitive bidding is one method of procurement, bribery is a common alternative in many Third World countries. Although bribery is often considered to be the ethical antithesis of competitive bidding, the analysis shows there is a fundamental isomorphism between bribery and competitive bidding on the supply side of the transaction.en_US
dc.format.extent355906 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleA comparison of bribery and bidding in thin marketsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Illinois, Champaign, IL 61820, USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/26307/1/0000392.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(86)90068-6en_US
dc.identifier.sourceEconomics Lettersen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
0000392.pdf
Size:
347.5KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.