Show simple item record

Long-term follow-up of patients treated with coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction

dc.contributor.authorKander, Nathan H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorO'Neill, William W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTopol, Eric J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGallison, Lynneen_US
dc.contributor.authorMileski, Roberten_US
dc.contributor.authorEllis, Stephen G.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-07T20:44:24Z
dc.date.available2006-04-07T20:44:24Z
dc.date.issued1989-08en_US
dc.identifier.citationKander, Nathan H., O'Neill, William, Topol, Eric J., Gallison, Lynn, Mileski, Robert, Ellis, Stephen G. (1989/08)."Long-term follow-up of patients treated with coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction." American Heart Journal 118(2): 228-233. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/27821>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6W9H-4BK9S3M-24/2/ab2fc3a537cbc6f8297c626ccb53a38een_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/27821
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=2526574&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractLong-term follow-up data for patients treated with coronary angioplasty (PTCA) for acute myocardial infarction are limited. Therefore the long-term outcome of 336 consecutive patients treated with PTCA at a median of 4.5 hours (range 0.5 to 48 hours) from symptom onset was evaluated. The in-hospital mortality was 11.1% (37 patients). Follow-up is complete for 293 of 299 (98%) hospital survivors at a median of 24 months. Of patients discharged, the mean age was 55 +/- 11 years, 49% received intravenous thrombolytic therapy, 53% had multivessel coronary artery disease, and the mean ejection fraction was 48 +/- 10%. Post-discharge survival was 96.1% at 1 year and 93.6% at 2 years by life table analysis. Post-discharge survival was independently predicted by no prior myocardial infarction (96.9% versus 87.3% 2-year survival, p p = 0.02]). For patients with analyzable ventriculograms at hospital discharge, ejection fraction &gt;= 40% was also a significant independent predictor of survival (98.1% versus 85.8% 2-year survival, p = 0.01). For patients with a successful PTCA, time from symptom onset to catheterization and angioplasty 4 hours was also an independent predictor of outcome (97.1% versus 91.4% 2-year survival; p = 0.04). Freedom from recurrent myocardial infarction was achieved in 95.2% of patients at 1 year and in 93.1% at 2 years. The only independent predictors of recurrent nonfatal myocardial infarction were a history of diabetes mellitus (p = 0.004), and multivessel coronary artery disease (p = 0.03). During follow-up, 7.1% of patients had repeat PTCA and 11.0% had coronary artery bypass surgery. Independent predictors of late revascularization were a history of prior myocardial infarction and an age p &lt; 0.05). At latest follow-up, 27.3% of patients reported symptoms of angina pectoris (mean angina CLASS = 1.8 +/- 0.8). The only independent predictor of late angina was a closed infarct artery at hospital discharge. We conclude that post-discharge survival in this group of patients trreated with angioplasty in the setting of an acute myocardial infarction was 93% at 2 years, and that survival may be as high as 97% in patients without prior myocardial infarction and in patients treated successfully within 4 hours of symptom onset. Further symptoms of ischemia are not uncommon despite an 18% incidence of repeat angioplasty or bypass surgery at 2 years' time.en_US
dc.format.extent731924 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleLong-term follow-up of patients treated with coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarctionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, the University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich., USA.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, the University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich., USA.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, the University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich., USA.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, the University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich., USA.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, the University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich., USA.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, the University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich., USA.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid2526574en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/27821/1/0000227.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(89)90180-4en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Heart Journalen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.