Show simple item record

Mate selection preferences in Germany and the United States

dc.contributor.authorBuss, David M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAngleitner, Aloisen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-07T21:00:43Z
dc.date.available2006-04-07T21:00:43Z
dc.date.issued1989en_US
dc.identifier.citationBuss, David M., Angleitner, Alois (1989)."Mate selection preferences in Germany and the United States." Personality and Individual Differences 10(12): 1269-1280. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/28242>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V9F-45Y7P91-2H/2/350ae9e6a1752d5071cfd9ce939ff67cen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/28242
dc.description.abstractTwo studies examined expressed mate selection preferences in German and American samples. In the first study (German N=343; American N=313), subjects ranked 13 characteristics on their desirability in a potential mate. Large and consistent sex differences were predicted and found within each country on valuation of good earning capacity (females more) and physical attractiveness (males more). The largest cultural differences were found for valuation of the characteristics Good Housekeeper (Germans more) and Physical Attractiveness (Americans more). A second study (German N=751; American N=1137) was conducted to replicate and extend these results using two separate testing instruments and larger more diverse samples within each country. The basic sex differences within countries and cultural differences across sexes were robustly replicated. None the less, the two countries showed remarkable similarity in patterns of mating preferences across characteristics. Discussion emphasizes the theoretical significance of these findings and identifies important directions for future research in human mating systems.en_US
dc.format.extent1252341 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleMate selection preferences in Germany and the United Statesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1346, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Bielefeld, 4800 Bielefeld, F.R.G.en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/28242/1/0000695.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(89)90239-0en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePersonality and Individual Differencesen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.