Show simple item record

Sweet taste preference in women smokers: Comparison with nonsmokers and effects of menstrual phase and nicotine abstinence

dc.contributor.authorPomerleau, Cynthia S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, Anne Weinsteinen_US
dc.contributor.authorDrewnowski, Adamen_US
dc.contributor.authorPomerleau, Ovide F.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-10T14:30:26Z
dc.date.available2006-04-10T14:30:26Z
dc.date.issued1991-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationPomerleau, Cynthia S., Garcia, Anne W., Drewnowski, Adam, Pomerleau, Ovide F. (1991/12)."Sweet taste preference in women smokers: Comparison with nonsmokers and effects of menstrual phase and nicotine abstinence." Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 40(4): 995-999. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/29019>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T0N-47RWPY7-1K/2/891fc0cc1a1b7686137c0b2eaca6fd20en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/29019
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=1816587&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractCigarette smokers weigh less than comparably aged nonsmokers, and many gain weight following cessation. Though some evidence suggests that nicotine reduces food intake, with a selective effect on sweet-tasting foods, the issue remains unresolved. In the current study, 64 women (20 smokers, 26 never-smokers, and 18 ex-smokers) were tested for sweet taste preference; 9 of these smokers were studied under conditions of both ad lib smoking and overnight abstinence, in three hormonally verified menstrual phases. 1) Although no overall differences were detected in taste preference among the three groups, significantly more smokers than nonsmokers preferred the higher sucrose concentrations. 2) No significant differences due to menstrual phase were observed. 3) Although preference ratings did not differ significantly between overnight abstinence and ad lib smoking, a subset of smokers who preferred higher sucrose concentrations rated their preference for the solutions significantly higher during the ad lib smoking sessions. Our findings suggest that smoking and nonsmoking women differ with respect to taste preference and that, at least in a subset of female smokers, preference is affected by nicotine abstinence/acute dosing.en_US
dc.format.extent495074 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleSweet taste preference in women smokers: Comparison with nonsmokers and effects of menstrual phase and nicotine abstinenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiological Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Psychiatry Behavioral Medicine Program, Division of Kinesiology and School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Psychiatry Behavioral Medicine Program, Division of Kinesiology and School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Psychiatry Behavioral Medicine Program, Division of Kinesiology and School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Psychiatry Behavioral Medicine Program, Division of Kinesiology and School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid1816587en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/29019/1/0000049.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0091-3057(91)90118-Len_US
dc.identifier.sourcePharmacology Biochemistry and Behavioren_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.