Show simple item record

Who's pro-choice and why

dc.contributor.authorBetzig, Lauraen_US
dc.contributor.authorLombardo, Leslie Hodgkinsen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-10T15:22:50Z
dc.date.available2006-04-10T15:22:50Z
dc.date.issued1992-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationBetzig, Laura, Lombardo, Leslie Hodgkins (1992/01)."Who's pro-choice and why." Ethology and Sociobiology 13(1): 49-71. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/30276>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6X2B-45RC81C-38/2/1d53719b602ce7cc453b377937fd9cefen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/30276
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=11656142&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractIn the United States, women and men have had roughly the same attitudes on abortion for decades. This seems strange, since the costs of an unplanned conception can be much greater for women. But they may be greatest for women most at risk--for single women of reproductive age--and for their families. Results of a telephone survey in and around Ann Arbor, Michigan, show that unmarried women between menarche and menopause are more likely to express pro-choice opinions, to vote for pro-choice candidates for public office, and to spend time or money on pro-choice activities. So are their grandparents, parents, and siblings. Results of a state-by-state comparison of governors' and legislatures' positions on abortion suggest that both are more pro-choice as the proportion of women at risk goes up. Perhaps even more important, legal restrictions on abortion, requiring parental notice or consent, and reducing the availability of public funding, are more common in states with lower proportions of single, reproductive-aged women.en_US
dc.format.extent3426894 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleWho's pro-choice and whyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumEvolution & Human Behavior Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumEvolution & Human Behavior Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid11656142en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/30276/1/0000677.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(92)90006-Pen_US
dc.identifier.sourceEthology and Sociobiologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.