Who's pro-choice and why
dc.contributor.author | Betzig, Laura | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lombardo, Leslie Hodgkins | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-04-10T15:22:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-04-10T15:22:50Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1992-01 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Betzig, Laura, Lombardo, Leslie Hodgkins (1992/01)."Who's pro-choice and why." Ethology and Sociobiology 13(1): 49-71. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/30276> | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6X2B-45RC81C-38/2/1d53719b602ce7cc453b377937fd9cef | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/30276 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=11656142&dopt=citation | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | In the United States, women and men have had roughly the same attitudes on abortion for decades. This seems strange, since the costs of an unplanned conception can be much greater for women. But they may be greatest for women most at risk--for single women of reproductive age--and for their families. Results of a telephone survey in and around Ann Arbor, Michigan, show that unmarried women between menarche and menopause are more likely to express pro-choice opinions, to vote for pro-choice candidates for public office, and to spend time or money on pro-choice activities. So are their grandparents, parents, and siblings. Results of a state-by-state comparison of governors' and legislatures' positions on abortion suggest that both are more pro-choice as the proportion of women at risk goes up. Perhaps even more important, legal restrictions on abortion, requiring parental notice or consent, and reducing the availability of public funding, are more common in states with lower proportions of single, reproductive-aged women. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 3426894 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3118 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.title | Who's pro-choice and why | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Evolution & Human Behavior Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Evolution & Human Behavior Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 11656142 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/30276/1/0000677.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(92)90006-P | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Ethology and Sociobiology | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.