Show simple item record

Who Uses the Cost-Benefit Rules of Choice? Implications for the Normative Status of Microeconomic Theory

dc.contributor.authorLarrick, Richard P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNisbett, Richard E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, James N.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-10T15:29:11Z
dc.date.available2006-04-10T15:29:11Z
dc.date.issued1993-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationLarrick Richard P., , Nisbett Richard E., , Morgan James N., (1993/12)."Who Uses the Cost-Benefit Rules of Choice? Implications for the Normative Status of Microeconomic Theory." Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 56(3): 331-347. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/30415>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WP2-45P68B1-1/2/063ce8a05d0b1b11e36cb973ec554416en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/30415
dc.description.abstractWe find three factors to be associated with use of cost-benefit rules in everyday decisions. These are effectiveness in achieving desirable life outcomes, intelligence, and training in economics. We argue that these empirical findings support the claim that cost-benefit reasoning is normative.en_US
dc.format.extent908976 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleWho Uses the Cost-Benefit Rules of Choice? Implications for the Normative Status of Microeconomic Theoryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Chicago; University of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Chicago; University of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Chicago; University of Michiganen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/30415/1/0000035.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1993.1058en_US
dc.identifier.sourceOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processesen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.