Show simple item record

Three methods for measuring range of motion while wearing protective clothing: A comparative study

dc.contributor.authorAdams, Paul S. (Paul Stuart)en_US
dc.contributor.authorKeyserling, W. Monroeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-10T15:34:16Z
dc.date.available2006-04-10T15:34:16Z
dc.date.issued1993-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationAdams, Paul S., Keyserling, W. Monroe (1993/10)."Three methods for measuring range of motion while wearing protective clothing: A comparative study." International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 12(3): 177-191. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/30540>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V31-481DT7F-5M/2/7fe545466ff9a8a36dbb5f8598475b6ben_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/30540
dc.description.abstractThis paper evaluates three methods for objectively measuring ROM while workers are wearing protective clothing: a universal goniometer, a Leighton Flexometer, and an electrogoniometer. Ten male subjects performed a set of nine gross body movements while semi-nude and while wearing each of nine configurations of coveralls. Coveralls varied in relative size and fabric weight. Changes in joint angles were measured simultaneously with the goniometer and the electrogoniometer, and then simultaneously with the Flexometer and the electrogoniometer.The goniometer and Flexometer data were positively correlated across garment treatments, but the electrogoniometer data were not highly correlated with either the goniometer or Flexometer data. Precision was similar between the goniometer and Flexometer, but the goniometer was found to be much less invasive than the Flexometer.en_US
dc.format.extent1290511 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleThree methods for measuring range of motion while wearing protective clothing: A comparative studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelIndustrial and Operations Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCenter for Ergonomics, Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2117, USA.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Health Sciences, Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61790-5220, USA.en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/30540/1/0000173.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-8141(93)90024-8en_US
dc.identifier.sourceInternational Journal of Industrial Ergonomicsen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.