Show simple item record

Roughness discrimination in cats with dorsal column lesions

dc.contributor.authorDobry, P. J. K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCasey, Kenneth L.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-17T16:46:21Z
dc.date.available2006-04-17T16:46:21Z
dc.date.issued1972-09-29en_US
dc.identifier.citationDobry, P. J. K., Casey, Kenneth L. (1972/09/29)."Roughness discrimination in cats with dorsal column lesions." Brain Research 44(2): 385-397. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/34035>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6SYR-4840TN8-309/2/97e17ddbf3a1326c6b34d956ba39b66fen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/34035
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=4507103&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstract1. (1) Seven normal cats and 17 cats with dorsal column total (DC) lesions of 2-100% of the DC cross-sectional area were given neurological tests. Cats with lesions as large as 86% showed no deficits on neurological examination. All cats with lesions greater than 90% showed signs of neurological impairment.2. (2) Six cats with high cervical DC lesions were compared with 4 intact controls in a roughness-discrimination task of 4 graded levels. Two cats with 97% and 100% destruction of their total DC cross-sectional area failed to reach criterion on the second discrimination level; cats with 38-86% DC lesions learned the highest discmination grade as quickly as intact controls.3. (3) DC lesions of 69-86% in pretained cats failed to produce evidence of lasting postoperative deficits when compared with pretrained, sham-operated controls; however, a cat with a 100% lesion failed to reach criterion on the second discrimination level.4. (4) The results show that the effects of DC lesions in cats can be demonstr by neurological examination and roughness-discrimination tests. However, to show significant effects, at least 90% of the dorsal columns must be destroyed; in this study, such lesions were estimated to involve over 90% of the DC fibers transmitting information from the paws. Although these findings suggest a high level of functional redundancy within the DC system, alternative views of DC function and its analysis are suggested.en_US
dc.format.extent1027194 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleRoughness discrimination in cats with dorsal column lesionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNeurosciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMolecular, Cellular and Developmental Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Physiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Mich. 48104, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Physiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Mich. 48104, U.S.A.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid4507103en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/34035/1/0000312.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(72)90310-1en_US
dc.identifier.sourceBrain Researchen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.