Show simple item record

Sample designs and sampling methods for the Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Studies (CPES)

dc.contributor.authorHeeringa, Steven G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWagner, James R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTorres, Myriamen_US
dc.contributor.authorDuan, Naihuaen_US
dc.contributor.authorAdams, Terryen_US
dc.contributor.authorBerglund, Patricia A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-18T20:52:45Z
dc.date.available2006-04-18T20:52:45Z
dc.date.issued2004-11en_US
dc.identifier.citationHeeringa, Steven G.; Wagner, James; Torres, Myriam; Duan, Naihua; Adams, Terry; Berglund, Patricia (2004)."Sample designs and sampling methods for the Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Studies (CPES)." International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 13(4): 221-240. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/34225>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1049-8931en_US
dc.identifier.issn1234-988Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/34225
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=15719530&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper provides an overview of the probability sample designs and sampling methods for the Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Studies (CPES): the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R), the National Study of American Life (NSAL) and the National Latino and Asian American Study of Mental Health (NLAAS). The multi-stage sample design and respondent selection procedures used in these three studies are based on the University of Michigan Survey Research Center's National Sample designs and operations. The paper begins with a general overview of these designs and procedures and then turns to a more detailed discussion of the adaptation of these general methods to the three specific study designs. The detailed discussions of the individual study samples focus on design characteristics and outcomes that are important to analysts of the CPES data sets and to researchers and statisticians who are planning future studies. The paper describes how the expected survey cost and error structure for each of these surveys influenced the original design of the samples and how actual field experience led to changes and adaptations to arrive at the final samples of each survey population. Copyright © 2004 Whurr Publishers Ltd.en_US
dc.format.extent224815 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.titleSample designs and sampling methods for the Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Studies (CPES)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychiatryen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychiatryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, USA. ; Heeringa, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 426 Thompson Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USA.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, USA.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, USA.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, USA.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, USA.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Biostatistics, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid15719530en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/34225/1/179_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mpr.179en_US
dc.identifier.sourceInternational Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Researchen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.