Show simple item record

Cytologic artifacts and pitfalls of thyroid fine-needle aspiration using ThinPrep® The brand names ThinPrep® Cytyc®, Cytolyt®, and PreserveCyt® used throughout this article are registered trademarks of the Cytyc Corporation, Boxborough, MA.

dc.contributor.authorAfify, Alaa M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Jingen_US
dc.contributor.authorAl-Khafaji, Basim M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-19T13:30:39Z
dc.date.available2006-04-19T13:30:39Z
dc.date.issued2001-06-25en_US
dc.identifier.citationAfify, Alaa M.; Liu, Jing; Al-Khafaji, Basim M. (2001)."Cytologic artifacts and pitfalls of thyroid fine-needle aspiration using ThinPrep® The brand names ThinPrep® Cytyc®, Cytolyt®, and PreserveCyt® used throughout this article are registered trademarks of the Cytyc Corporation, Boxborough, MA. ." Cancer 93(3): 179-186. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/34358>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0008-543Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0142en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/34358
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=11391605&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND The ThinPrep® Processor has gained popularity as a collection and preparation technique for fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). Specific cytologic criteria to evaluate ThinPrep preparation (TP) may differ from those of conventional preparation (CP). The authors retrospectively reviewed the quality, cytologic features, and pitfalls of TP versus CP in thyroid FNABs and addressed the cytomorphologic criteria used to evaluate TP specimens. METHODS Thyroid FNABs received between January 1996–July 1999 were identified from the computer files of the Department of Pathology, University of Michigan (Ann Arbor, MI). Histologic correlation and clinical follow-up were reviewed. The cytology slides were reevaluated for cellularity, cellular preservation, artifacts, background material, architectural integrity, cytoplasmic details, and nuclear details by two observers. RESULTS Of the 209 thyroid FNABs performed during the study period, TP and CP prepared 127 and 82 cases respectively. Histologic correlation was available in 68 (33%) cases (32 TP and 36 CP). Overall sensitivity was 80% and specificity was 98%. The sensitivity of CP versus TP was 87% and 70%, respectively. Thyroid FNABs prepared by TP, as compared with CP, were characterized by the following: The TP slide 1) allowed assessment of the overall specimen cellularity but not individual passes of an FNAB, 2) contained only “hard” colloid that appeared dense, markedly fragmented, or in droplets, 3) showed crowded, tight, tissue clusters with loss of cellular preservation, especially in the larger aggregates, 4) demonstrated more cell shrinkage, 5) showed increased disruption of the cytoplasm and numerous naked nuclei, 6) occasionally gave nucleoli a more prominent appearance, and 7) was less likely to show nuclear grooves and “pseudoinclusions” in papillary carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS This study concluded that cytologic features used to evaluate thyroid FNABs prepared by CP may need to be modified when using TP. Awareness of the above-described findings and further studies to evaluate TP are essential to avoid potential diagnostic pitfalls. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2001;93:179–186. © 2001 American Cancer Society.en_US
dc.format.extent527437 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherCancer Research, Oncology and Pathologyen_US
dc.titleCytologic artifacts and pitfalls of thyroid fine-needle aspiration using ThinPrep® The brand names ThinPrep® Cytyc®, Cytolyt®, and PreserveCyt® used throughout this article are registered trademarks of the Cytyc Corporation, Boxborough, MA.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan ; Fax (734) 763-4095 ; Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, 2G322, Box 0054, Ann Arbor, MI 48109en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.identifier.pmid11391605en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/34358/1/9027_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.9027en_US
dc.identifier.sourceCanceren_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.