Show simple item record

Cytotoxicity of urethane dimethacrylate composites before and after aging and leaching

dc.contributor.authorMohsen, N. M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCraig, Robert G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHanks, Carl T.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-28T16:36:01Z
dc.date.available2006-04-28T16:36:01Z
dc.date.issued1998-02en_US
dc.identifier.citationMohsen, N. M.; Craig, R. G.; Hanks, C. T. (1998)."Cytotoxicity of urethane dimethacrylate composites before and after aging and leaching." Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 39(2): 252-260. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/38016>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0021-9304en_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-4636en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/38016
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=9457555&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractThe in vitro cytotoxicity of urethane dimethacrylate composites cured at different times by visible light and after different aging times and extraction treatments was evaluated using succinic dehydrogenase activity in the mitochondria of a fibroblastic cell line to reflect cell viability. In addition, extractable chemicals associated with cell response were identified. The composite samples were tested untreated, polished, or extracted with water or 75% ethanol-water. Balb/c 3T3 fibroblasts were used as the cell culture system while MTT-formazan production was used as the toxicity parameter. Cell viability was calculated as a percentage of Teflon controls. Identification of the chemicals was measured by extracting the composites with 75% ethanol-water, separating the extract by HPLC, and identifying the fractions with mass spectroscopy. In general, cell viability increased continuously with curing time for differently treated samples at high aging times (288 h) while it decreased when the composites were not aged (0 h). In addition, for 75% ethanol or water-extracted composites, cell viability increased within the first 24 h of aging and reached a plateau after 72 h. Lowest cytotoxicity occurred when the samples were extracted with the 75% ethanol solution. The highest cytotoxic effects were found when the samples were untreated. Slightly reduced cytotoxic effects were seen with polished composites. The results suggest that curing the light-activated composites for a minimum of 150 s and postcuring for 24 h is required to attain comparable biocompatibility with the Teflon control. Removing the oxygen-inhibited layer from these composites decreased the cytotoxicity by 33% while extracting the composites with 75% ethanol-water decreased it by 77%. Chemicals released from the surface accounted for approximately 40% of cellular response while about 60% of the response was due to chemical components released from the bulk. The primary leachable component from the composites was UDMA monomer. Small quantities of 1,6 hexane diol methacrylate, camphoroquinone, and 2,4,6-tritertiarybutyl phenol also were found. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res , 39 , 252–260, 1998.en_US
dc.format.extent317951 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherChemistryen_US
dc.subject.otherPolymer and Materials Scienceen_US
dc.titleCytotoxicity of urethane dimethacrylate composites before and after aging and leachingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiological Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiomedical Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biologic and Materials Sciences, Bioengineering Program and the School of Dentistry, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1078en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biologic and Materials Sciences, Bioengineering Program and the School of Dentistry, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1078 ; Department of Biologic and Materials Sciences, Bioengineering Program and the School of Dentistry, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1078en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biologic and Materials Sciences, Bioengineering Program and the School of Dentistry, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1078en_US
dc.identifier.pmid9457555en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/38016/1/12_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199802)39:2<252::AID-JBM12>3.0.CO;2-Fen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Biomedical Materials Researchen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.