Show simple item record

Who Is in Favor of Enlargement? Determinants of Support for EU Membership in the Candidate Countries’ Referenda

dc.contributor.authorDoyle, Orlaen_US
dc.contributor.authorFidrmuc, Janen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-08-01T16:27:02Z
dc.date.available2006-08-01T16:27:02Z
dc.date.issued2004-02-01en_US
dc.identifier.otherRePEc:wdi:papers:2004-660en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/40046en_US
dc.description.abstractWe analyze support for EU membership as expressed in voting patterns in the candidate countries’ referenda on EU membership, using regional referendum results and individual survey data on voting intentions. We find that favorable individual and regional characteristics are positively correlated with support for accession and voter participation. In contrast, those who should benefit from future EU transfers are less likely to vote and/or support EU membership. We argue that voters in the candidate countries assign greater weight on future benefits from liberalization and integration than on potential gains through redistribution.en_US
dc.format.extent75713 bytes
dc.format.extent3151 bytes
dc.format.extent1141878 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries660en_US
dc.subjectVoting, Referendum, EU Enlargement, Integrationen_US
dc.subject.otherJ61,_P26,_P33,_Z13en_US
dc.titleWho Is in Favor of Enlargement? Determinants of Support for EU Membership in the Candidate Countries’ Referendaen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/40046/3/wp660.pdfen_US
dc.owningcollnameWilliam Davidson Institute (WDI) - Working Papers


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.