Show simple item record

Qualitative differences in psychiatric symptoms between high risk groups assessed on a screening test (GHQ-30)

dc.contributor.authorHuppert, Felicia A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, Anne Weinsteinen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-08T19:35:02Z
dc.date.available2006-09-08T19:35:02Z
dc.date.issued1991-11en_US
dc.identifier.citationHuppert, Felicia A.; Garcia, Anne Weinstein; (1991). "Qualitative differences in psychiatric symptoms between high risk groups assessed on a screening test (GHQ-30)." Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 26(6): 252-258. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/41738>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0933-7954en_US
dc.identifier.issn1433-9285en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/41738
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=1792555&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractScores on five subscales derived from the GHQ-30 have been examined in various groups at risk for psychiatric disorder, to determine whether different patterns of symptoms are found. The subscales are based on a factor analysis of a population sample of over 6,000 adults (Huppert et al. 1989) which identified five robust factors corresponding to symptoms of anxiety, feelings of incompetence, depression, difficulty in coping and social dysfunction. Previous studies have identified certain groups of people who are vulnerable to mental illness and are therefore likely to obtain a high score on the GHQ. These include unemployed men, single women with dependent children, and elderly people in poor health. The results show marked differences in symptom patterns among these three at-risk groups. For example, while scores on anxiety and depression subscales were significantly raised in most at-risk groups, young unemployed men did not show significant anxiety whereas elderly men in poor health did not show significant depressive symptoms. However both these groups showed difficulty in coping, unlike older unemployed men or elderly women in poor health. Single women with dependent children reported the highest rate of psychiatric symptoms, particularly anxiety and depression, but had difficulty in coping only if they were also employed. These findings suggest that this method of analysing data from the GHQ-30 has potential value in yielding qualitative as well as quantitative information about psychiatric symptoms.en_US
dc.format.extent840733 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlagen_US
dc.subject.otherPsychiatryen_US
dc.subject.otherMedicine & Public Healthen_US
dc.titleQualitative differences in psychiatric symptoms between high risk groups assessed on a screening test (GHQ-30)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychiatryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Kinesiology, Department of Sport, Management and Communication, University of Michigan, 401 Washtenaw Avenue, 48109-2214, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, CB22QQ, Cambridge, UKen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid1792555en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/41738/1/127_2004_Article_BF00789216.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00789216en_US
dc.identifier.sourceSocial Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.