Show simple item record

Capabilities of two- and three-dimensional FDG-PET for detecting small lesions and lymph nodes in the upper torso: a dynamic phantom study

dc.contributor.authorRaylman, Raymond R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWahl, Richard L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKison, Paul V.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-08T19:56:37Z
dc.date.available2006-09-08T19:56:37Z
dc.date.issued1999-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationRaylman, Raymond R.; Kison, Paul V.; Wahl, Richard L.; (1999). "Capabilities of two- and three-dimensional FDG-PET for detecting small lesions and lymph nodes in the upper torso: a dynamic phantom study." European Journal of Nuclear Medicine 26(1): 39-45. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/42075>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0340-6997en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/42075
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=9933660&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractThe capabilities and limitations of two-(2D) and three-dimensional (3D) fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in detecting small tumors and lymph nodes were studied in a phantom modeling the human chest and axilla. Multiple dual-radionuclide phantom studies were performed. Five hollow spheres ranging in diameter from 3 mm to 15 mm were filled with carbon-11 and placed in the axillary and mediastinal regions of an anthropomorphic phantom containing hollow organs filled with 18 F to simulate FDG uptake 1 h after injection. Dynamic imaging was performed to acquire PET images with varying target-to-background ratios. Imaging was performed in 2D and 3D acquisition modes, with and without attenuation correction, on a modern PET scanner. Lesion detectability was visually and quantitatively assessed. For objects larger than 9 mm in diameter, target-to-background ratios ranging from ∼3:1 to ∼10:1 were detectable. Objects < 9 mm in diameter required a target-to-background ratio of ≥18:1. Target-to-background ratios required for lesion detectability were equivalent for 2D and 3D PET images with and without attenuation correction. In conclusion, 2D and 3D PET with attenuation correction consistently detected ”tumors”≥ 9 mm. Lesions < 9 mm could be detected if there was high enough tumor uptake. No statistically significant differences in lesion detection were found for 2D versus 3D PET, or for attenuation-corrected versus non-attenuation-corrected images.en_US
dc.format.extent92621 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlag; Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelbergen_US
dc.subject.otherKey Words: Positron Emission Tomographyen_US
dc.subject.otherLegacyen_US
dc.subject.otherTumor Detectionen_US
dc.subject.otherNuclear Medicineen_US
dc.titleCapabilities of two- and three-dimensional FDG-PET for detecting small lesions and lymph nodes in the upper torso: a dynamic phantom studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelRadiologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPhysicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiological Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, USA, USen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, USA, USen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Radiology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, USA, USen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid9933660en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/42075/1/259-26-1-39_90260039.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002590050357en_US
dc.identifier.sourceEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicineen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.