Show simple item record

The ERG of guinea pig ( Cavis porcellus ): comparison with I-type monkey and E-type rat

dc.contributor.authorLei, Boen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-08T20:32:28Z
dc.date.available2006-09-08T20:32:28Z
dc.date.issued2003-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationLei, Bo; (2003). "The ERG of guinea pig ( Cavis porcellus ): comparison with I-type monkey and E-type rat." Documenta Ophthalmologica 106(3): 243-249. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/42622>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0012-4486en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-2622en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/42622
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=12737501&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractWe have been in search of an alternate species for the monkey to study the effects of drugs on the I-type photopic electroretinogram (ERG) response that is typically seen in the cone-rich retina of the primate. The guinea pig has two types of cones, one of which contains a middle-wavelength sensitive pigment otherwise found only in Old World primates. We studied the Ganzfeld electroretinogram (ERG) of the guinea pig in relation to monkey and rat ERGs to learn whether the guinea pig might be a good animal model to study the `primate-like' cone ERG. The guinea pig scotopic ERG was similar to other mammal ERGs and was not electronegative when fully dark-adapted. We saw no evidence of a negative-going scotopic threshold response (STR). The guinea pig photopic ERG a-wave is larger than that of the rat but much smaller than the primate a-wave, and it lacked a phasic d-wave. PDA eliminated guinea pig photopic a-wave and caused the OFF-response to long stimuli to invert polarity, as seen in monkey but not in rat. The guinea pig overall shows a weak I-type response and may be a useful substitute for primate in some studies of the photopic ERG.en_US
dc.format.extent378364 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherMedicine & Public Healthen_US
dc.subject.otherOphthalmologyen_US
dc.subject.otherBipolar Cellsen_US
dc.subject.otherConeen_US
dc.subject.otherElectroretinogramen_US
dc.subject.otherGuinea Pigen_US
dc.subject.otherMonkeyen_US
dc.subject.otherRaten_US
dc.titleThe ERG of guinea pig ( Cavis porcellus ): comparison with I-type monkey and E-type raten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOpthalmologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, W. K. Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Vision Science, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Missouri–Columbia, Columbia, MO, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid12737501en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/42622/1/10633_2004_Article_5090224.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022940517793en_US
dc.identifier.sourceDocumenta Ophthalmologicaen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.