Show simple item record

Compressive response and failure of fiber reinforced unidirectional composites

dc.contributor.authorLee, S. H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWaas, Anthony M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-08T20:41:00Z
dc.date.available2006-09-08T20:41:00Z
dc.date.issued1999-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationLee, S.H.; Waas, Anthony M.; (1999). "Compressive response and failure of fiber reinforced unidirectional composites." International Journal of Fracture 100(3): 275-306. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/42752>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0376-9429en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-2673en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/42752
dc.description.abstractThe compressive response of polymer matrix fiber reinforced unidirectional composites (PMC's) is investigated via a combination of experiment and analysis. The study accounts for the nonlinear constitutive response of the polymer matrix material and examines the effect of fiber geometric imperfections, fiber mechanical properties and fiber volume fraction on the measured compressive strength and compressive failure mechanism.Glass and carbon fiber reinforced unidirectional composite specimens are manufactured in-house with fiber volume fractions ranging over 10∼60 percent. Compression test results with these specimens show that carbon fiber composites have lower compressive strengths than glass fiber composites. Glass fiber composites demonstrate a splitting failure mode for a range of low fiber volume fractions and a simultaneous splitting/kink banding failure mode for high fiber volume fractions. Carbon fiber composites show kink banding throughout the range of fiber volume fractions examined. Nonlinear material properties of the matrix, orthotropic material properties of the carbon fiber, initial geometric fiber imperfections and nonuniform fiber volume fraction are all included in an appropriate finite element analysis to explain some of the observed experimental results. A new analytical model predictionof the splitting failure mode shows that this failure mode is favorable for glass fiber composites, which is in agreement with test results. Furthermore, this modelis able to show the influence of fiber mechanical properties, fiber volume fraction and fiber geometry on the splitting failure mode.en_US
dc.format.extent875034 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherPhysicsen_US
dc.subject.otherCharacterization and Evaluation Materialsen_US
dc.subject.otherMechanicsen_US
dc.subject.otherMechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.otherAutomotive and Aerospace Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.otherCivil Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.otherKink Bandingen_US
dc.subject.otherSplittingen_US
dc.subject.otherCompression Strengthen_US
dc.subject.otherFracture.en_US
dc.titleCompressive response and failure of fiber reinforced unidirectional compositesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMaterials Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Aerospace Engineering, University of Michigan, MI, 48109-2140, Ann Arbor, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Aerospace Engineering, University of Michigan, MI, 48109-2140, Ann Arbor, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/42752/1/10704_2004_Article_240671.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1018779307931en_US
dc.identifier.sourceInternational Journal of Fractureen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.