JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
A Formal Study of Distributed Meeting Scheduling
Sen, Sandip; Durfee, Edmund H.
1998-05
Citation:Sen, Sandip; Durfee, Edmund H.; (1998). "A Formal Study of Distributed Meeting Scheduling." Group Decision and Negotiation 7 (3): 265-289. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/42829>
Abstract: Automating routine organizational tasks, such as meeting scheduling, requires a careful balance between the individual (respecting his or her privacy and personal preferences) and the organization (making efficient use of time and other resources). We argue that meeting scheduling is an inherently distributed process, and that negotiating over meetings can be viewed as a distributed search process. Keeping the process tractable requires introducing heuristics to guide distributed schedulers' decisions about what information to exchange and whether or not to propose the same tentative time for several meetings. While we have intuitions about how such heuristics could affect scheduling performance and efficiency, verifying these intuitions requires a more formal model of the meeting schedule problem and process. We present our preliminary work toward this goal, as well as experimental results that validate some of the predictions of our formal model. We also investigate scheduling in overconstrained situations, namely, scheduling of high priority meetings at short notice, which requires cancellation and rescheduling of previously scheduled meetings. Our model provides a springboard into deeper investigations of important issues in distributed artificial intelligence as well, and we outline our ongoing work in this direction.