Show simple item record

Macroinvertebrate Responses to Algal and Bacterial Manipulations in Streams

dc.contributor.authorFuller, Randall L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKennedy, Brian P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNielsen, Carlen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-08T20:50:54Z
dc.date.available2006-09-08T20:50:54Z
dc.date.issued2004-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationFuller, Randall L.; Kennedy, Brian P.; Nielsen, Carl; (2004). "Macroinvertebrate Responses to Algal and Bacterial Manipulations in Streams." Hydrobiologia 523 (1-3): 113-126. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/42901>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0018-8158en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-5117en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/42901
dc.description.abstractOur study was designed to assess the relative importance of algae and bacteria as sources of energy for stream macroinvertebrates. In one experiment, we manipulated algae by artificially shading six sections in each of two streams, one stream with an open canopy (clear-cut drainage basin) and the other with a closed canopy (forested drainage basin); both streams were in Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire, USA. Chlorophyll a concentrations were reduced from 0.2 to 0.05 μ g/cm 2 in artificially shaded sections of both streams. However, macroinvertebrates showed no response to these algal manipulations in either the clear-cut or forested stream. Nutrient concentrations (N and P) were low and limiting to primary production in both the clear-cut and forested streams. Additionally, both streams had relatively low macroinvertebrate densities suggesting bottom-up controls were important in macroinvertebrate abundance. However, the forested stream did have higher macroinvertebrate densities presumably because of higher inputs of coarse particulate organic matter from the riparian vegetation. In a second experiment, in Augusta Creek, Michigan, we manipulated both algae and bacteria. To reduce algae, we artificially shaded experimental stream channels so that chlorophyll a was reduced from natural levels of 3.0–5.6 to 0.4–0.7 μ g/cm 2 . Half of the shaded channels had dissolved organic carbon (DOC – sucrose) dripped into them to raise DOC levels by 2–3 mg/l and thus stimulate bacterial abundance. Open channels, with higher algal abundance, had higher densities of Ephemerella , but only in November when nymphs were larger. Channels with increased DOC had higher bacterial abundances, higher densities of Chironomidae and lower densities of Heptageniidae. Several other macroinvertebrate taxa that were at relatively low abundance in our samples showed no significant response to these manipulations. Our results suggest that early instar Ephemerella may not rely as heavily on algae as later instars. Also, certain taxa were able to use the heterotrophic microbial community, especially chironomids which increased in numbers when bacterial density increased; thus, the bacterial carbon source may be more important to some stream macroinvertebrates than previous studies have suggested.en_US
dc.format.extent306384 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherLife Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherEcologyen_US
dc.subject.otherHydrobiologyen_US
dc.subject.otherMacroinvertebrate Feedingen_US
dc.subject.otherTrophic Relationsen_US
dc.subject.otherFood Qualityen_US
dc.subject.otherStream Periphytonen_US
dc.subject.otherMicrobial Communitiesen_US
dc.subject.otherChironomidaeen_US
dc.titleMacroinvertebrate Responses to Algal and Bacterial Manipulations in Streamsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumBiology Department, , Colgate University, , , Hamilton, , NY, , 13346-1398, , USA; Tel.:, ; Department of Geological Sciences, , University of Michigan, , , 2534 C.C. Little Building, , Ann Arbor, , MI, , 48109 USA,en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherBiology Department, , Colgate University, , , Hamilton, , NY, , 13346-1398, , USA; Tel.:,en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherBiology Department, , Colgate University, , , Hamilton, , NY, , 13346-1398, , USA; Tel.:,en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/42901/1/10750_2004_Article_5271883.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:HYDR.0000033099.48058.e8en_US
dc.identifier.sourceHydrobiologiaen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.