Show simple item record

Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction

dc.contributor.authorWang, Renxiaoen_US
dc.contributor.authorLai, Luhuaen_US
dc.contributor.authorWang, Shaomengen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-08T20:55:18Z
dc.date.available2006-09-08T20:55:18Z
dc.date.issued2002-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationWang, Renxiao; Lai, Luhua; Wang, Shaomeng; (2002). "Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction." Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 16(1): 11-26. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/42967>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0920-654Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-4951en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/42967
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=12197663&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractNew empirical scoring functions have been developed to estimate the binding affinity of a given protein-ligand complex with known three-dimensional structure. These scoring functions include terms accounting for van der Waals interaction, hydrogen bonding, deformation penalty, and hydrophobic effect. A special feature is that three different algorithms have been implemented to calculate the hydrophobic effect term, which results in three parallel scoring functions. All three scoring functions are calibrated through multivariate regression analysis of a set of 200 protein-ligand complexes and they reproduce the binding free energies of the entire training set with standard deviations of 2.2 kcal/mol, 2.1 kcal/mol, and 2.0 kcal/mol, respectively. These three scoring functions are further combined into a consensus scoring function, X-CSCORE. When tested on an independent set of 30 protein-ligand complexes, X-CSCORE is able to predict their binding free energies with a standard deviation of 2.2 kcal/mol. The potential application of X-CSCORE to molecular docking is also investigated. Our results show that this consensus scoring function improves the docking accuracy considerably when compared to the conventional force field computation used for molecular docking.en_US
dc.format.extent208795 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherChemistryen_US
dc.subject.otherComputer Applications in Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.otherPhysical Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.otherAnimal Anatomy / Morphology / Histologyen_US
dc.subject.otherBinding Affinity Predictionen_US
dc.subject.otherConsensus Scoringen_US
dc.subject.otherEmpirical Scoring Molecular Dockingen_US
dc.subject.otherStructure-based Drug Designen_US
dc.titleFurther development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity predictionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelChemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelChemical Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMaterials Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumMedical Chemistry and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-0934, U.S.Aen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumMedical Chemistry and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-0934, U.S.A; Institute of Physical Chemistry, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, P.R. Chinaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherInstitute of Physical Chemistry, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, P.R. Chinaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid12197663en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/42967/1/10822_2004_Article_405419.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1016357811882en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Computer-Aided Molecular Designen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.