Show simple item record

A psychometric analysis of the Quality of Life-Cancer Survivors (QOL-CS) in survivors of childhood cancer

dc.contributor.authorZebrack, Bradley J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChesler, Mark A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-08T21:34:27Z
dc.date.available2006-09-08T21:34:27Z
dc.date.issued2001-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationZebrack, Brad J.; Chesler, Mark A.; (2001). "A psychometric analysis of the Quality of Life-Cancer Survivors (QOL-CS) in survivors of childhood cancer." Quality of Life Research 10(4): 319-329. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/43562>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0962-9343en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-2649en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/43562
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=11763245&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractGiven the increasing interest in quality of life research in cancer survivorship, psychometric properties of the Quality of Life-Cancer Survivors (QOL-CS) were explored in a group of childhood cancer survivors. The QOL-CS is a 41-item visual analog scale composed of four multi-item sub-scales (physical well-being, psychological well-being, social well-being, spiritual well-being) and two sub-components (fears, distress). This instrument was incorporated in a mailed survey completed by 177 respondents. The underlying factor structure and internal reliability of the instrument were explored. A preliminary assessment of the external validity of the factor structure was undertaken. Results of a factor analysis were theoretically consistent with elements assessed in the QOL-CS, although misclassification of several items was noted and discussed. Internal-consistency reliability was very good (Cronbach's α = 0.80–0.89) for five of the six factors. Moderate (0.30 < r < 0.45) to high ( r > 0.60) concurrent validity was observed for four factors. Discriminant validity was noted across groups defined by health and social status variables. Psychometric analysis indicated that the instrument measured distinct and relevant domains of quality of life for childhood cancer survivors, but in its current form does not appear to be an optimal measure of quality of life in this population.en_US
dc.format.extent110837 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherMedicine & Public Healthen_US
dc.subject.otherPublic Health/Gesundheitswesenen_US
dc.subject.otherQuality of Life Researchen_US
dc.subject.otherCancer Survivorsen_US
dc.subject.otherChildhood Canceren_US
dc.subject.otherQuality of Lifeen_US
dc.subject.otherQuestionnaire Validationen_US
dc.subject.otherSociologyen_US
dc.titleA psychometric analysis of the Quality of Life-Cancer Survivors (QOL-CS) in survivors of childhood canceren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCenter for Research on Social Organization, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Pediatrics, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid11763245en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/43562/1/11136_2004_Article_354702.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1012228823115en_US
dc.identifier.sourceQuality of Life Researchen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.