Show simple item record

Assumptions underlying quantitative and qualitative research: Implications for institutional research

dc.contributor.authorHathaway, Russel S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-08T21:37:50Z
dc.date.available2006-09-08T21:37:50Z
dc.date.issued1995-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationHathaway, Russel S.; (1995). "Assumptions underlying quantitative and qualitative research: Implications for institutional research." Research in Higher Education 36(5): 535-562. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/43615>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0361-0365en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-188Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/43615
dc.description.abstractFor institutional researchers, the choice to use a quantitative or qualitative approach to research is dictated by time, money, resources, and staff. Frequently, the choice to use one or the other approach is made at the method level. Choices made at this level generally have rigor, but ignore the underlying philosophical assumptions structuring beliefs about methodology, knowledge, and reality. When choosing a method, institutional researchers also choose what they believe to be knowledge, reality, and the correct method to measure both. The purpose of this paper is to clarify and explore the assumptions underlying quantitative and qualitative research. The reason for highlighting the assumptions is to increase the general level of understanding and appreciation of epistemological issues in institutional research. Articulation of these assumptions should foster greater awareness of the appropriateness of different kinds of knowledge for different purposes.en_US
dc.format.extent1618255 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers-Human Sciences Press; Human Sciences Press, Inc. ; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherEducation (General)en_US
dc.subject.otherEducationen_US
dc.titleAssumptions underlying quantitative and qualitative research: Implications for institutional researchen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducationen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumThe University of Michigan, 4216D School of Education Building, 48109-1259, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/43615/1/11162_2005_Article_BF02208830.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02208830en_US
dc.identifier.sourceResearch in Higher Educationen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.