Harbinger I: The Development and Evaluation of the First PACT Replication
dc.contributor.author | Mulder, Rodney | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Plum, Thomas B. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mowbray, Carol T. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Collins, Mary E. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Masterton, Ted | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-09-11T14:16:36Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-09-11T14:16:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1997-11 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Mowbray, Carol T.; Collins, Mary E.; Plum, Thomas B.; Masterton, Ted; Mulder, Rodney; (1997). "Harbinger I: The Development and Evaluation of the First PACT Replication." Administration and Policy in Mental Health 25(2): 105-123. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44093> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0894-587X | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1573-3289 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44093 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=9727211&dopt=citation | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | While Assertive Community Treatment (originally known as the PACT program) is now recognized around the world as an effective model for rehabilitation of persons with severe mental illness, this was not the case 20 years ago. Harbinger of Grand Rapids, in Kent County, Michigan, was the first replication of the PACT model which sought fidelity and included an experimental design for assessing effectiveness. The design and results are presented from an initial 30-month and a follow-up 66-month evaluation of Harbinger. The 30-month evaluation showed significant differences favoring Harbinger vs. the control group on independent living, employment, and client functioning. At 66-months, there were fewer experimental-control group differences. The differences in results are analyzed in terms of design and data collection problems, changes in the treatment environment for the control group, and the longitudinal course of mental illness. The discussion focuses on next steps in ACT research, utilizing program theory to better establish the mechanisms for successful intervention models. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 1191995 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3115 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers; Human Sciences Press, Inc. ; Springer Science+Business Media | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Psychiatry | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Medicine & Public Health | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Public Health/Gesundheitswesen | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Clinical Psychology | en_US |
dc.title | Harbinger I: The Development and Evaluation of the First PACT Replication | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Psychology | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Public Health | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Psychiatry | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Social Work | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | School of Social Work, University of Michigan, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | School of Social Work, University of Michigan, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Michigan Department of Community Health, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Harbinger, Inc., Grand Rapids | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Sociology, Grand Valley State University, Grand Rapids | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 9727211 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/44093/1/10488_2004_Article_414561.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022230803615 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Administration and Policy in Mental Health | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.