Show simple item record

Estrogenic Effects of Toremifene and Tamoxifen in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Patients

dc.contributor.authorEllmén, J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHakulinen, P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPartanen, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHayes, Daniel F.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T14:27:17Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T14:27:17Z
dc.date.issued2003-11en_US
dc.identifier.citationEllmén, J.; Hakulinen, P.; Partanen, A.; Hayes, D.F.; (2003). "Estrogenic Effects of Toremifene and Tamoxifen in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Patients." Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 82(2): 103-111. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44217>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-7217en_US
dc.identifier.issn0167-6806en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44217
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=14692654&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractIntrinsic estrogenicities of the selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) toremifene 60 mg daily or 200 mg daily and tamoxifen 20 mg daily (TOR60, TOR200 and TAM20) were compared in a randomized clinical study in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. The study was open label in three parallel groups. Variables for analysis were serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), estradiol (E2), antithrombin III (AT III), aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) and vaginal cytology. Clinical efficacy and safety have been reported earlier. A total of 648 patients were randomized (221 to TOR60, 212 to TOR200 and 215 to TAM20). Sera were available for the analysis from 148, 165 and 156 and for vaginal cytology from 98, 93 and 86 patients, respectively. All treatment regimens showed tissue-specific and dose-dependent estrogen agonist effect. In the primary measure of in vivo estrogenicity, effect on hypothalamus–pituitary-axis, all three treatment regimens decreased serum FSH ( p < 0.001). TOR200 was more potent than the two other treatments ( p < 0.05), but surprisingly, TAM20 was more estrogenic than TOR60 ( p < 0.001). As could be expected in postmenopausal women, the treatments had no effect on mean serum E2 concentrations and decrease of serum LH was similar to that of FSH. Estrogenic effect on the liver was seen as dose-dependent increase of SHBG with statistically significant differences between the treatment groups ( p < 0.001). Trends of transient ASAT elevations in TOR200 group ( p = 0.07) and in all treatment groups AT III decrease ( p = 0.1) were seen in the beginning of the treatment. TOR60 or TAM20 did not have an effect on mean ASAT values, and AT III decreased in TAM20 group more than in the two other groups ( p = 0.1 compared to TOR60 and p < 0.05 compared to TOR200). Estrogenic effects on vaginal superficial cells were higher in TOR60 and TOR200 groups when compared to TAM20 ( p < 0.05). Toremifene and tamoxifen had tissue-specific and partially dose-dependent estrogenic effects in hypothalamus–pituitary-axis, in the liver and in the vaginal epithelium of postmenopausal women. In some tissues tamoxifen 20 may be more estrogenic than toremifene 60 mg/day.en_US
dc.format.extent195094 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherHormonal Effectsen_US
dc.subject.otherMedicine & Public Healthen_US
dc.subject.otherOncologyen_US
dc.subject.otherBreast Canceren_US
dc.subject.otherPostmenopausalen_US
dc.subject.otherTamoxifenen_US
dc.subject.otherToremifeneen_US
dc.titleEstrogenic Effects of Toremifene and Tamoxifen in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOtolaryngologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelObstetrics and Gynecologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOphthalmologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNeurosciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherR&D, Biostatistics and Data Management, Orion Corporation, Orion Pharma, Turku, Finlanden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherClinical Development, Orion Corporation, Orion Pharma, Turku, Finlanden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherR&D, Biostatistics and Data Management, Orion Corporation, Orion Pharma, Turku, Finlanden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid14692654en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/44217/1/10549_2004_Article_5150739.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:BREA.0000003957.54851.11en_US
dc.identifier.sourceBreast Cancer Research and Treatmenten_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.