Show simple item record

Cognitive Inflexibility Among Ruminators and Nonruminators

dc.contributor.authorDavis, Robert N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNolen-Hoeksema, Susanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T14:38:42Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T14:38:42Z
dc.date.issued2000-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationDavis, Robert N.; Nolen-Hoeksema, Susan; (2000). "Cognitive Inflexibility Among Ruminators and Nonruminators." Cognitive Therapy and Research 24(6): 699-711. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44338>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0147-5916en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-2819en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44338
dc.description.abstractDysphoric people who ruminate about their negative mood experience longer and more intense depressive episodes, yet often persist in ruminating. This study investigated whether a ruminative coping style would be related to a cognitive style marked by perseveration and inflexibility. We examined the performance of ruminators and nonruminators on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), a measure of cognitive flexibility, and tasks measuring related cognitive processes. Ruminators committed significantly more perseverative errors and failed to maintain set significantly more often than nonruminators on the WCST. On an advanced section of the WCST designed for this study, male ruminators exhibited significantly greater inflexibility than male nonruminators. These effects could not be attributed to differences in general intelligence or the presence of depressed mood. Results suggest that rumination may be characterized by, and perhaps prolonged by, an inflexible cognitive style.en_US
dc.format.extent70342 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers; Plenum Publishing Corporation ; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherPersonalityen_US
dc.subject.otherDevelopmental Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherClinical Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherCognitive Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherRuminationen_US
dc.subject.otherCognitive Inflexibilityen_US
dc.subject.otherGenderen_US
dc.titleCognitive Inflexibility Among Ruminators and Nonruminatorsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-1109en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-1109en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/44338/1/10608_2004_Article_227193.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1005591412406en_US
dc.identifier.sourceCognitive Therapy and Researchen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.