Why Commercial Surrogate Motherhood Unethically Commodifies Women and Children: Reply to McLachlan and Swales
dc.contributor.author | Anderson, Elizabeth S. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-09-11T14:51:04Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-09-11T14:51:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2000-03 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Anderson, Elizabeth S.; (2000). "Why Commercial Surrogate Motherhood Unethically Commodifies Women and Children: Reply to McLachlan and Swales." Health Care Analysis 8(1): 19-26. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44474> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1065-3058 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1573-3394 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44474 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=10977157&dopt=citation | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | McLachlan and Swales dispute my arguments against commercial surrogatemotherhood. In reply, I argue that commercial surrogate contractsobjectionably commodify children because they regardparental rights over children not as trusts, to be allocated in the bestinterests of the child, but as like property rights, to be allocatedat the will o the parents. They also express disrespect for mothers, bycompromising their inalienable right to act in the best interest of theirchildren, when this interest calls for mothers to assert a custody rightin their children. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 30744 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3115 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Kluwer Academic Publishers; Springer Science+Business Media | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Commercial Surrogate Motherhood | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Public Health/Gesundheitswesen | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Ethics | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Philosophy | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Philosophy of Medicine | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Commodification | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Surrogacy | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Brazier Report | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Medical Ethics | en_US |
dc.title | Why Commercial Surrogate Motherhood Unethically Commodifies Women and Children: Reply to McLachlan and Swales | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Public Health | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Department of Philosophy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 10977157 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/44474/1/10728_2004_Article_260071.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009477906883 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Health Care Analysis | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.