Show simple item record

Missed opportunities: Psychological ramifications of counterfactual thought in midlife women

dc.contributor.authorLandman, Janeten_US
dc.contributor.authorVandewater, Elizabeth A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorStewart, Abigail J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMalley, Janet E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T15:04:46Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T15:04:46Z
dc.date.issued1995-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationLandman, Janet; Vandewater, Elizabeth A.; Stewart, Abigail J.; Malley, Janet E.; (1995). "Missed opportunities: Psychological ramifications of counterfactual thought in midlife women." Journal of Adult Development 2(2): 87-97. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44634>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1068-0667en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-3440en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44634
dc.description.abstractCounterfactual thinking entails the process of imagining alternatives to reality—what might have been. The present study examines the frequency, content, and emotional and cognitive concomitants of counterfactual thinking about past missed opportunities in midlife women. At age 43, nearly two-thirds of the sample of educated adult women reported having missed certain opportunities at some time in their lives. Most of the counterfactual thoughts concerned missed opportunities for greater challenge in work. Emotional distress at age 33 did not predict later counterfactual thought. Instead, counterfactual thinking at age 43 was associated with concurrent emotional distress. However, acknowledging counterfactual thinking about the past was also associated with envisioning ways to change things for the better in the future. This suggests the possibility that the negative appraisal often entailed in counterfactual thinking may be associated with emotional distress in the short run but with motivational benefits in the long run, at least for middle-aged women.en_US
dc.format.extent1057475 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers; Plenum Publishing Corporation ; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherCounterfactual Thoughten_US
dc.subject.otherCognitive Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherWorken_US
dc.subject.otherClinical Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherAgingen_US
dc.subject.otherPersonality & Social Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherPsychology, Generalen_US
dc.subject.otherEmotionen_US
dc.subject.otherMidlife Womenen_US
dc.subject.otherMotivationen_US
dc.titleMissed opportunities: Psychological ramifications of counterfactual thought in midlife womenen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelWest European Studiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSoutheast Asian and Pacific Languages and Culturesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Worken_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelLatin American and Caribbean Studiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelGermanic Languages and Literatureen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelCommunicationsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHumanitiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Psychology, The University of Michigan, 525 E. University St., 48109-1109, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Psychology, The University of Michigan, 525 E. University St., 48109-1109, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherMurray Research Center, Radcliffe College, 02138, Cambridge, Massachusettsen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherSt. Lawrence University, 13612, Canton, New Yorken_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/44634/1/10804_2005_Article_BF02251257.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02251257en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Adult Developmenten_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.