Methods of measuring the size and complexity of PLC programs in different logic control design methodologies
dc.contributor.author | Lucas, M. R. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Tilbury, Dawn M. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-09-11T16:35:11Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-09-11T16:35:11Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2005-09 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Lucas, M.R.; Tilbury, D.M.; (2005). "Methods of measuring the size and complexity of PLC programs in different logic control design methodologies." The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 26 (5-6): 436-447. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/45886> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0268-3768 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1433-3015 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/45886 | |
dc.description.abstract | Currently there is a wide variety of logic control design methodologies used in industrial logic design. These methodologies include ladder diagrams, function block diagrams, sequential function charts, and flow charts, but driven by a desire for verifiability, academics are developing additional logic control design methodologies, such as modular finite state machines and Petri nets. Using these, important properties of programs can be verified and some logic can be generated automatically from a part plan. The main contribution of this paper is to define methods for measuring programs written in different methodologies, so that the performance of the methodologies can be compared. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 709504 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3115 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Springer-Verlag | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Logiccontrol | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Industrial and Production Engineering | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Mechanical Engineering | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Engineering | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD, CAE) and Design | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Production/Logistics | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Comparison of Logic Design Methods | en_US |
dc.subject.other | PLC Program Complexity | en_US |
dc.title | Methods of measuring the size and complexity of PLC programs in different logic control design methodologies | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Management | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Information and Library Science | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Industrial and Operations Engineering | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Computer Science | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Economics | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Business | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Engineering | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Engineering Research Center for Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems, Department of Mechanical Engineering, , University of Michigan, , , Ann Arbor, , MI, , 48109-2125, , USA, | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Engineering Research Center for Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems, Department of Mechanical Engineering, , University of Michigan, , , Ann Arbor, , MI, , 48109-2125, , USA, | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/45886/1/170_2003_Article_1996.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1996-0 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.