Show simple item record

Methods of measuring the size and complexity of PLC programs in different logic control design methodologies

dc.contributor.authorLucas, M. R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTilbury, Dawn M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T16:35:11Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T16:35:11Z
dc.date.issued2005-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationLucas, M.R.; Tilbury, D.M.; (2005). "Methods of measuring the size and complexity of PLC programs in different logic control design methodologies." The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 26 (5-6): 436-447. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/45886>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0268-3768en_US
dc.identifier.issn1433-3015en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/45886
dc.description.abstractCurrently there is a wide variety of logic control design methodologies used in industrial logic design. These methodologies include ladder diagrams, function block diagrams, sequential function charts, and flow charts, but driven by a desire for verifiability, academics are developing additional logic control design methodologies, such as modular finite state machines and Petri nets. Using these, important properties of programs can be verified and some logic can be generated automatically from a part plan. The main contribution of this paper is to define methods for measuring programs written in different methodologies, so that the performance of the methodologies can be compared.en_US
dc.format.extent709504 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlagen_US
dc.subject.otherLogiccontrolen_US
dc.subject.otherIndustrial and Production Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.otherMechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.otherEngineeringen_US
dc.subject.otherComputer-Aided Engineering (CAD, CAE) and Designen_US
dc.subject.otherProduction/Logisticsen_US
dc.subject.otherComparison of Logic Design Methodsen_US
dc.subject.otherPLC Program Complexityen_US
dc.titleMethods of measuring the size and complexity of PLC programs in different logic control design methodologiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelManagementen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInformation and Library Scienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelIndustrial and Operations Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelComputer Scienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumEngineering Research Center for Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems, Department of Mechanical Engineering, , University of Michigan, , , Ann Arbor, , MI, , 48109-2125, , USA,en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumEngineering Research Center for Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems, Department of Mechanical Engineering, , University of Michigan, , , Ann Arbor, , MI, , 48109-2125, , USA,en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/45886/1/170_2003_Article_1996.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1996-0en_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.