Show simple item record

Intertemporal self-selection with multiple buyers

dc.contributor.authorSwierzbinski, Joseph E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBagnoli, Marken_US
dc.contributor.authorSalant, Stephen W.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T17:23:37Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T17:23:37Z
dc.date.issued1995-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationBagnoli, Mark; Salant, Stephen W.; Swierzbinski, Joseph E.; (1995). "Intertemporal self-selection with multiple buyers." Economic Theory 5(3): 513-526. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/46113>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1432-0479en_US
dc.identifier.issn0938-2259en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/46113
dc.description.abstractWe consider a monopolist selling durable goods to consumers with unit demands but different preferences for quality. The seller can offer items of different quality at the same time to induce buyers to self-select, as in Mussa-Rosen (1978), but is not artificially constrained to offer only one such menu. Instead the seller can offer without precommitment a sequence of menus over time. In the two-buyer case where the seller has complete information about each buyer's marginal valuation for quality, the seller's profits exceed what can be obtained from a single menu and sometimes approximate the profits of a perfectly discriminating monopolist. In companion papers (Bagnoli et al., 1990, 1992), we show that these conclusions continue to hold (1) in the infinite-horizon case with any finite number of buyers and (2) in two-period examples where the seller has incomplete information about buyer preferences.en_US
dc.format.extent871325 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlagen_US
dc.subject.otherAnalysisen_US
dc.subject.otherEconomic Theoryen_US
dc.subject.otherEconomics / Management Scienceen_US
dc.subject.otherEconomics Generalen_US
dc.titleIntertemporal self-selection with multiple buyersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Economics, University of Michigan, 48109, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Economics, University of Michigan, 48109, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Finance, School of Business, Indiana University, 47405, Bloomington, IN, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/46113/1/199_2005_Article_BF01212331.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01212331en_US
dc.identifier.sourceEconomic Theoryen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.