View Item 

Show simple item record

Randomized Comparison of a 90 uF Capacitor Three-electrode Defibrillation System with a 125 uF Two-electrode Defibrillation System

dc.contributor.authorBahu, Marwanen_US
dc.contributor.authorKnight, Bradley P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWeiss, Raulen_US
dc.contributor.authorHahn, Stephen J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGoyal, Rajivaen_US
dc.contributor.authorDaoud, Emile G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMan, K. Chingen_US
dc.contributor.authorMorady, Freden_US
dc.contributor.authorStrickberger, S. Adamen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T17:41:09Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T17:41:09Z
dc.date.issued1997-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationBahu, Marwan; Knight, Bradley P.; Weiss, Raul; Hahn, Stephen J.; Goyal, Rajiva; Daoud, Emile G.; Man, K. Ching; Morady, Fred; Strickberger, S. Adam; (1997). "Randomized Comparison of a 90 uF Capacitor Three-electrode Defibrillation System with a 125 uF Two-electrode Defibrillation System." Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 2(1): 41-45. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/46357>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1383-875Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1572-8595en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/46357
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: A variety of factors, including the number of defibrillation electrodes and shocking capacitance, may influence the defibrillation efficacy of an implantable defibrillator system. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the defibrillation energy requirement using a 125 uF two-electrode defibrillation system and a 90 uF three-electrode defibrillation system.en_US
dc.format.extent77563 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherMedicine & Public Healthen_US
dc.subject.otherCardiologyen_US
dc.subject.otherImplantable Cardioverter-defibrillatoren_US
dc.subject.otherDefibrillation Thresholden_US
dc.subject.otherDefibrillation Energy Requirementen_US
dc.titleRandomized Comparison of a 90 uF Capacitor Three-electrode Defibrillation System with a 125 uF Two-electrode Defibrillation Systemen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Cardiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Cardiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Cardiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Cardiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Cardiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Cardiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Cardiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Cardiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCardiac Pacemakers, Inc, St. Paul, MNen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/46357/1/10840_2004_Article_160463.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009760706944en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
10840_2004_Article_160463.pdf
Size:
75.74KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.