Show simple item record

Comparison of opioid agonists in maintaining responding and in suppressing morphine withdrawal in rhesus monkeys

dc.contributor.authorYoung, Alice M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSwain, Henry H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWoods, James H.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T17:45:57Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T17:45:57Z
dc.date.issued1981-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationYoung, Alice M.; Swain, Henry H.; Woods, James H.; (1981). "Comparison of opioid agonists in maintaining responding and in suppressing morphine withdrawal in rhesus monkeys." Psychopharmacology 74(4): 329-335. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/46424>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1432-2072en_US
dc.identifier.issn0033-3158en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/46424
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=6794076&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractSixteen opioid agonists were studied for their capacity both to maintain responding previously reinforced by codeine and to suppress the withdrawal syndrome induced by morphine deprivation in rhesus monkeys. All compounds, which included examples from each of the major chemical families of opioids, maintained responding at rates above those maintained by saline. There were differences among the compounds in the maximal response rates maintained, and large differences in their potencies in maintaining responding. In morphine-dependent monkeys, the abstinence signs that developed 14 h after the last morphine dose were suppressed completely by all of the compounds except codeine. There was a strong positive correlation ( r =0.92) between the potency of a compound in maintaining drug-reinforced responding and the potency of the compound in suppressing the morphine withdrawal syndrome.en_US
dc.format.extent856356 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlagen_US
dc.subject.otherHeroinen_US
dc.subject.otherDrug Selfadministrationen_US
dc.subject.otherKetobemidoneen_US
dc.subject.otherFentanylen_US
dc.subject.otherMorphineen_US
dc.subject.otherPharmacology/Toxicologyen_US
dc.subject.otherAzidomorphineen_US
dc.subject.otherDrug-reinforced Behavioren_US
dc.subject.otherMethadoneen_US
dc.subject.otherRhesus Monkeysen_US
dc.subject.otherBiomedicineen_US
dc.subject.otherPsychiatryen_US
dc.subject.otherCodeineen_US
dc.subject.otherLevorphanolen_US
dc.subject.otherMeperidineen_US
dc.subject.otherPropoxypheneen_US
dc.subject.otherOpioid Agonistsen_US
dc.subject.otherOpioid Dependenceen_US
dc.subject.otherMorphine Withdrawal Syndromeen_US
dc.titleComparison of opioid agonists in maintaining responding and in suppressing morphine withdrawal in rhesus monkeysen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychiatryen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNeurosciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelChemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiological Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, 48109, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, 48109, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, 48109, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, 767 Mackenzie Hall, 48202, Detroit, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid6794076en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/46424/1/213_2004_Article_BF00432741.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00432741en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePsychopharmacologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.