Show simple item record

Acquisition of children's addition strategies: A model of impasse-free, knowledge-level learning

dc.contributor.authorJones, Randolph M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVanlehn, Kurten_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T18:22:29Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T18:22:29Z
dc.date.issued1994-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationJones, Randolph M.; Vanlehn, Kurt; (1994). "Acquisition of children's addition strategies: A model of impasse-free, knowledge-level learning." Machine Learning 16 (1-2): 11-36. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/46917>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0885-6125en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-0565en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/46917
dc.description.abstractWhen children learn to add, they count on their fingers, beginning with the simple Sum Strategy and gradually developing the more sophisticated and efficient Min strategy. The shift from Sum to Min provides an ideal domain for the study of naturally occurring discovery processes in cognitive skill acquisition. The Sum -to- Min transition poses a number of challenges for machine-learning systems that would model the phenomenon. First, in addition to the Sum and Min strategies, Siegler and Jenkins (1989) found that children exhibit two transitional strategies, but not a strategy proposed by an earlier model. Second, they found that children do not invent the Min strategy in response to impasses, or gaps in their knowledge. Rather, Min develops spontaneously and gradually replaces earlier strategies. Third, intricate structural differences between the Sum and Min strategies make it difficult, if not impossible, for standard, symbol-level machine-learning algorithms to model the transition. We present a computer model, called Gips , that meets these challenges. Gips combines a relatively simple algorithm for problem solving with a probabilistic learning algorithm that performs symbol-level and knowledge-level learning, both in the presence and absence of impasses. In addition, Gips makes psychologically plausible demands on local processing and memory. Most importantly, the system successfully models the shift from Sum to Min , as well as the two transitional strategies found by Siegler and Jenkins.en_US
dc.format.extent1759593 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherComputer Scienceen_US
dc.subject.otherComputing Methodologiesen_US
dc.subject.otherArtificial Intelligence (Incl. Robotics)en_US
dc.subject.otherSimulation and Modelingen_US
dc.subject.otherLanguage Translation and Linguisticsen_US
dc.subject.otherAutomation and Roboticsen_US
dc.subject.otherCognitive Simulationen_US
dc.subject.otherImpasse-free Learningen_US
dc.subject.otherProbabilistic Learningen_US
dc.subject.otherInductionen_US
dc.subject.otherProblem-solving Strategiesen_US
dc.titleAcquisition of children's addition strategies: A model of impasse-free, knowledge-level learningen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelComputer Scienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelScience (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumArtificial Intelligence Laboratory, University of Michigan, 1101 Beal Avenue, 48109-2110, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherLearning Research and Development Center, and Department of Computer Science, University of Pittsburgh, 15260, Pittsburgh, PAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/46917/1/10994_2004_Article_BF00993172.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00993172en_US
dc.identifier.sourceMachine Learningen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.