Show simple item record

Effects of inhibitors of RNA and protein synthesis on bean hypocotyl hook opening and their implications regarding phytochrome action

dc.contributor.authorKang, B. G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRay, Peter M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T19:02:19Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T19:02:19Z
dc.date.issued1969-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationKang, B. G.; Ray, P. M.; (1969). "Effects of inhibitors of RNA and protein synthesis on bean hypocotyl hook opening and their implications regarding phytochrome action." Planta 87(3): 217-226. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/47490>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1432-2048en_US
dc.identifier.issn0032-0935en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/47490
dc.description.abstractInhibitors of protein and RNA synthesis (cycloheximide, puromycin, chloramphenicol, and actinomycin D), as well as Co ++ , induce opening of the hypocotyl hook of bean seedlings during the early stage of the opening period both in the darkness and red light. The response is transitory, however, complete straightening of a hook can not be achieved in the presence of these agents. These agents abolish the response of hooks to red illumination. They also block the suppression of hook opening caused by IAA and ethylene. The response and sensitivity to GA are not affected by the inhibitors. Inhibitors of DNA synthesis (FUDR and mitomycin C) have no effect on hook opening. It appears that in this growth response RNA and protein synthesis are more immediately involved in ethylene action than they are in the cell elongation process or the action of GA thereon.en_US
dc.format.extent556657 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlagen_US
dc.subject.otherLife Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherAgricultureen_US
dc.subject.otherEcologyen_US
dc.subject.otherForestryen_US
dc.subject.otherPlant Sciencesen_US
dc.titleEffects of inhibitors of RNA and protein synthesis on bean hypocotyl hook opening and their implications regarding phytochrome actionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Botany, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; MSU/AEC Plant Research Laboratory, Michigan State University, 48823, East Lansing, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Botany, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, 94305, Stanford, California, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid24504754en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/47490/1/425_2004_Article_BF00389366.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00389366en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePlantaen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.