Show simple item record

Psychophysical study of numbers

dc.contributor.authorBaird, John C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNoma, Ellioten_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T19:02:48Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T19:02:48Z
dc.date.issued1975-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationBaird, John C.; Noma, Elliot; (1975). "Psychophysical study of numbers." Psychological Research 37(4): 281-297. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/47497>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0340-0727en_US
dc.identifier.issn1430-2772en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/47497
dc.description.abstractTwo experiments were conducted to study the number biases of subjects in situations not involving the usual psychophysical stimuli. In Exp. I subjects were asked to generate numbers (within boundary conditions) they thought other people would produce under the same conditions. In Exp. II only a single lower boundary (e.g., 1,10 or 100) was employed and subjects generated a set of numbers larger than the boundary. Results suggested that definite number biases exist. Multiples of 1, 10, 100 and to a lesser extent 5, 50 and 500 dominate and are appropriate to the log cycle. That is, multiples of 1 occur most often in the cycle 1–10, multiples of 10 in the cycle 10–100, etc. The implications of these results are noted for several psychophysical theories.en_US
dc.format.extent1221999 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlagen_US
dc.subject.otherPsychology, Generalen_US
dc.subject.otherPsychologyen_US
dc.titlePsychophysical study of numbersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire; University of Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshireen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/47497/1/426_2004_Article_BF00309723.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00309723en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePsychological Researchen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.