Show simple item record

A comparison between mesospheric wind measurements made near Christchurch (44°S, 173°E) using the high resolution doppler imager (HRDI) and a medium frequency (MF) radar

dc.contributor.authorBurrage, M. D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFrame, D. J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLawrence, B. N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFraser, G. J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T19:29:00Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T19:29:00Z
dc.date.issued2000-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationFrame, D. J.; Lawrence, B. N.; Fraser, G. J.; Burrage, M. D.; (2000). "A comparison between mesospheric wind measurements made near Christchurch (44°S, 173°E) using the high resolution doppler imager (HRDI) and a medium frequency (MF) radar." Annales Geophysicae 18(5): 555-565. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/47866>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1432-0576en_US
dc.identifier.issn0992-7689en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/47866
dc.description.abstractWe report on the comparison of winds measured by a medium frequency (MF) radar near Christchurch, New Zealand, and by the high resolution doppler imager (HRDI). Previous comparisons have demonstrated that there can be significant differences in the winds obtained by the two techniques, and our results are no different. However, these data show relatively good agreement in the meridional direction, but large differences in the zonal direction, where the radar is regularly measuring the zonal wind as too easterly. To do the comparison, overpasses from the satellite must be obtained when it is close to the radar site. The radar data are averaged in time around the overpass because we know the radars sample phenomena which have spatial and temporal scales which make them invisible to HRDI. There are a limited number of overpass comparisons which limit our confidence in these results, but a detailed analysis of these data show that the proximity of the overpass is often an important factor in the differences obtained. Other factors examined include the influence of the local time of the overpass, and the amount of radar data averaged around the overpass time.en_US
dc.format.extent314852 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlag; EGS – Springer-Verlagen_US
dc.subject.otherMeteorology and Atmospheric Dynamics (Middle Atmosphere Dynamics; Instruments and Techniques)en_US
dc.subject.otherGeosciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherAstronomyen_US
dc.subject.otherAstrophysicsen_US
dc.subject.otherAtmospheric Composition and Structure (Instruments and Techniques)en_US
dc.subject.otherGeophysics/Geodesyen_US
dc.subject.otherExtraterrestrial Physics, Space Sciencesen_US
dc.titleA comparison between mesospheric wind measurements made near Christchurch (44°S, 173°E) using the high resolution doppler imager (HRDI) and a medium frequency (MF) radaren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPhysicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelAtmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSpace Physics Research Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Canterbury, NZen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Canterbury, NZen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Canterbury, NZen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/47866/1/585_2000_Article_180555.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00585-000-0555-3en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAnnales Geophysicaeen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.