Model Selection in an Information Economy: Choosing what to Learn
dc.contributor.author | Brooks, Christopher H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Gazzale, Robert S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Das, Rajarshi | |
dc.contributor.author | Kephart, Jeffrey O. | |
dc.contributor.author | MacKie-Mason, Jeffrey K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Durfee, Edmund H. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-04-10T20:03:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2007-04-10T20:03:41Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2002-11 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Computational Intelligence, vol. 18, no. 4 (Nov. 2002): 566-582. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/50438> | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/50438 | |
dc.description.abstract | In an economy in which a producer must learn the preferences of a consumer population, it is faced with a classic decision problem: when to explore and when to exploit. If the producer has a limited number of chances to experiment, it must explicitly consider the cost of learning (in terms of foregone profit) against the value of the information acquired. Information goods add an additional dimension to this problem; due to their flexibility, they can be bundled and priced according to a number of different price schedules. An optimizing producer should consider the profit each price schedule can extract, as well as the difficulty of learning of this schedule. In this paper, we demonstrate the tradeoff between complexity and profitability for a number of common price schedules. We begin with a one-shot decision as to which schedule to learn. Schedules with moderate complexity are preferred in the short and medium term, as they are learned quickly, yet extract a significant fraction of the available profit. We then turn to the repeated version of this one-shot decision and show that moderate complexity schedules, in particular two-part tariff, perform well when the producer must adapt to nonstationarity in the consumer population. When a producer can dynamically change schedules as it learns, it can use an explicit decision-theoretic formulation to greedily select the schedule which appears to yield the greatest profit in the next period. | en |
dc.format.extent | 225806 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en |
dc.title | Model Selection in an Information Economy: Choosing what to Learn | en |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Information and Library Science | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Information, School of | en |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/50438/1/comp-intel.pdf | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Information, School of (SI) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.