Show simple item record

Bilateral Negotiation With Fees

dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Axel
dc.contributor.authorIonel, Birgean
dc.contributor.authorMacKie-Mason, Jeffrey K.
dc.date.accessioned2007-04-11T03:44:11Z
dc.date.available2007-04-11T03:44:11Z
dc.date.issued1999
dc.identifier.citationProceedings of the First IAC Workshop on Internet Based Negotiation Technologies, Hawthorne, NY, March 18-19, 1999. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/50451>en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/50451
dc.description.abstractBilateral negotiation over a single good or service is a fundamental problem for automated systems, and is surprisingly resistant to general solutions. In this paper we offer advice and new results for the design of electronic negotiation and market systems. We review the theoretical and experimental literature as guide to pragmatic design. We then investigate how some well-studied simple mechanisms could be extended with transaction and entry fees to improve their efficiency or their budget balance. The goal is to support pragmatic design for online automated transactions. We find that an iterated Generalized Vickrey Auction with fees can maintain budget balance and improve trading efficiency over a single-shot GVA. For k-double auctions we find that when processing costs are a function of the number of bids then efficiency favors entry fees, while transactions fees are favored if processing costs are a function of the number of transactions. We present simulations to support our theoretical conclusions.en
dc.format.extent295739 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.titleBilateral Negotiation With Feesen
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInformation and Library Science
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.contributor.affiliationumInformation, School ofen
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/50451/1/fees.pdfen_US
dc.owningcollnameInformation, School of (SI)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.