View Item 

Show simple item record

A comparison of the natural diatom population proportions to those consumed by the caddisfly larvae of Glossosoma nigrior.

dc.contributor.authorMaurice, Charles G.en_US
dc.coverage.spatialMaple River - East Branchen_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-06-14T19:40:58Z
dc.date.available2007-06-14T19:40:58Z
dc.date.issued1981en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/53441
dc.format.extent546510 bytes
dc.format.extent3144 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.relation.haspartGraphen_US
dc.subjectStreamsen_US
dc.subject.otherBEHAVIORen_US
dc.subject.otherFEEDINGen_US
dc.subject.otherPREFERENCEen_US
dc.subject.otherAQUATICen_US
dc.subject.otherDIATOMSen_US
dc.subject.otherINVERTEBRATESen_US
dc.subject.otherFOODen_US
dc.subject.otherTRICHOPTERAen_US
dc.subject.otherCADDISFLIESen_US
dc.subject.otherGLOSSOSOMAen_US
dc.subject.otherINSECTSen_US
dc.titleA comparison of the natural diatom population proportions to those consumed by the caddisfly larvae of Glossosoma nigrior.en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resource and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumBiological Station, University of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/53441/1/1875.pdfen_US
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 1875.pdf : Access restricted to on-site users at the U-M Biological Station.en_US
dc.owningcollnameBiological Station, University of Michigan (UMBS)


Files in this item

Name:
1875.pdf
Size:
533.7KB
Format:
PDF
Description:
Access restricted to on-site ...
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.