Show simple item record

Foraging behavior by beaver (Castor canadensis): examining preferences for species, distance, and tree size.

dc.contributor.authorSeidner, Andresen_US
dc.coverage.spatialUMBS Stationen_US
dc.coverage.spatialGrapevine Trailen_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-06-14T23:12:46Z
dc.date.available2007-06-14T23:12:46Z
dc.date.issued2000en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/54906
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to investigate the foraging behavior and preference of the beaver (Castor canadensis). This behavior is an example of the herbivore-plant interactions. Foraging strategies of herbivores and plant diversity are thought to be the result of co-evolution. We surveyed one site on Douglas Lake at UMBS in Cheboygan County where a beaver lodge existed and where extensive foraging took place in the surrounding forest. In four 20 x 20 m plots as replicates, we surveyed a total of 228 trees. The variables recorded were tree species, distance from the lake, and diameter at gnawing height (approximately 0.3 m above ground), and fate of the tree (unattacked, gnawed, felled, or removed). We found that beavers are selective for tree species. They preferred bigtooth aspen (Populus grandidentata) and American beech (Fagus grandifolia), and they did not prefer red oak (Quercus rubra), red maple (Acer rubrum), sugar maple (Acer saccharum), paper birch (Betula papyrifera), and the white ash (Fraxinus americana). White pine (Pinus strobus), red pine (Pinus resinosa), moosewood (or striped maple, Acer pensylvanicum), and silver maple (Acer saccharinum) were omitted from the data analyses because fewer than five trees were encountered for each. There was no particular preference for trees at distances from the lake, and a size-distance regression proved no significance, either. However, we suspected a larger sample size would have accentuated the slight negative relationship between the size of foraged trees and distance from the lake. It was also found that beavers selectively foraged on both large trees (d > 22.1 cm) and small trees (d < 9.7 cm). Beavers do not remove large felled trees, but often remove small trees from the foraging sites. These preferences suggest that beavers as a species have evolved feeding strategies to improve their relative rates of survival and reproduction.en_US
dc.format.extent960332 bytes
dc.format.extent3144 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.relation.haspartGraphen_US
dc.subjectGeneral Ecologyen_US
dc.subject.otherMAMMALSen_US
dc.subject.otherFORESTen_US
dc.subject.otherTREESen_US
dc.subject.otherOPTIMALen_US
dc.titleForaging behavior by beaver (Castor canadensis): examining preferences for species, distance, and tree size.en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resource and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumBiological Station, University of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/54906/1/3347.pdfen_US
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 3347.pdf : Access restricted to on-site users at the U-M Biological Station.en_US
dc.owningcollnameBiological Station, University of Michigan (UMBS)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.