Show simple item record

Arthropod diversity across burn plots of Northern Lower Peninsula: University of Michigan Biological Station.

dc.contributor.authorBabayan, Annaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMarsh, Nicholasen_US
dc.contributor.authorHalili, Londisaen_US
dc.coverage.spatialUMBS Burn Plotsen_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-06-14T23:26:01Z
dc.date.available2007-06-14T23:26:01Z
dc.date.issued2004en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/55002
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of our study was to examine relationships between the plant diversity and arthropod diversity in forests with different successions. In our study we examined seven burn plots: 1911, 1932, 1948, 1954, 1980 and 1998. We hypothesized that forests, with later burns would have smaller tree species diversity and therefore would have less arthropod species diversity. We also hypothesized that the more recently burned forest would have less leaf litter and therefore, would have fewer species of arthropods. Additionally, we hypothesized that there will be a positive correlation between the amount of groundcover and arthropod diversity. For our sampling method we used pit fall traps, which consisted of a cup (16oz) filled with 70% ethanol (3oz) placed into the ground. Five traps were placed on each burn plot in a 30x30 square meters area with a buffer zone of 30 meters into the forest from each edge of the burn plot. We also collected soil samples (top 10 cm of soil layer) to analyze the organic matter and moisture. We counted the groundcover (shrubs and seedlings) at each sampling point (around each pit fall trap) in 2x2 squared meters in each plot and all tree species in 900 square meters area. Leaf litter was collected on one square meter area around the center pit fall trap. Data analysis showed that overall arthropod diversity was positively correlated with the tree species richness. However, no signficant correlation was found with the forest successions. All orders (Coleoptera, Diptera, Araneida and Hymenoptera) that were found in the burn plots had a strong positive correlation with increased plant species richness. No correlation was found between percent moisture and percent organic matter across forests. We also did not find a correlation between the leaf litter mass and plant diversity. Overall our results support our hypothesis on increasing arthropod species richness with increasing plant diversity.en_US
dc.format.extent528144 bytes
dc.format.extent3144 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.relation.haspartDiagram or Illustrationen_US
dc.relation.haspartGraphen_US
dc.relation.haspartMapen_US
dc.relation.haspartTable of Numbersen_US
dc.subjectGeneral Ecologyen_US
dc.subject.classificationAspenen_US
dc.subject.otherVASCULARen_US
dc.subject.otherPLANTSen_US
dc.subject.otherARTHROPODSen_US
dc.subject.otherINSECTSen_US
dc.subject.otherINVERTEBRATESen_US
dc.subject.otherFORESTen_US
dc.subject.otherSUCCESSIONen_US
dc.subject.otherCOMMUNITYen_US
dc.subject.otherPRODUCTIVITYen_US
dc.subject.otherFIREen_US
dc.subject.otherSOILSen_US
dc.subject.otherORGANICen_US
dc.subject.otherMATTERen_US
dc.titleArthropod diversity across burn plots of Northern Lower Peninsula: University of Michigan Biological Station.en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resource and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumBiological Station, University of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/55002/1/3443.pdfen_US
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 3443.pdf : Access restricted to on-site users at the U-M Biological Station.en_US
dc.owningcollnameBiological Station, University of Michigan (UMBS)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.