Deep Blue
Deep Blue

Deep Blue at the University of Michigan > All Collections > Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed >

Please use this persistent URL to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/55229 ◀ bookmark this

Title: Research with families facing cancer: The challenges of accrual and retention
Authors: Northouse, Laurel L.
Rosset, Tansey
Phillips, Laurel
Mood, Darlene
Schafenacker, Ann
Kershaw, Trace
Issue Date: Jun-2006
Publisher: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
Citation: Northouse, Laurel L.; Rosset, Tansey; Phillips, Laurel; Mood, Darlene; Schafenacker, Ann; Kershaw, Trace (2006). "Research with families facing cancer: The challenges of accrual and retention We acknowledge the contributions of our outstanding data collectors: Charlotte Cowles, Marilyn Jeffs, Heather Kapp, Nancy Lunsford, Elizabeth Palen, Laurel Phillips, Tansey Rosset, Evelyn Sims, and Cordelia Tucker, as well as the excellent referral staff: Karen Baranowski, Monika Benedict, Judith Fardig, Kathleen Fasing, Elizabeth Galvin, Martha Heath, Patricia Kielczewski, Pamela Laszewski, Nancy Lefkowitz, Karin Olson, Donna Osborne, and Doris Sepe. ." Research in Nursing & Health 29(3): 199-211. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/55229>
Abstract: The purposes of this article are: (a) to describe and analyze the accrual and retention patterns in a longitudinal randomized clinical trial with prostate cancer patients and their partners, and (b) to discuss strategies that were used to overcome challenges in conducting this family-based study. Initially, 429 dyads were referred to the study. Of these, 166 were not enrolled due to refusal ( n  = 120) or ineligibility ( n  = 46), 21 of whom did not meet one or more of the inclusion criteria, and 25 of whom could not be reached within the 2-month window of eligibility. Of the 383 eligible dyads, 263 dyads were enrolled (enrollment rate of 68.7%). Accrual and retention patterns differed by research site, referral procedures, and phase of prostate cancer. The retention rate was very good with the majority of dyads ( n  = 218) completing all three follow-up assessments at 4, 8, and 12 months (82.9%). © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Res Nurs Health 29:199–211, 2006
URI: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db
=pubmed&list_uids=16676337&dopt=citation
ISSN: 0160-6891
1098-240X
DOI: 10.1002/nur.20128
PMID: 16676337
Appears in Collections:Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed
Nursing, School of

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat 
20128_ftp.pdf175KbAdobe PDFView/Open

Deep Blue encourages the fair use of copyrighted material, and you are free to link to content here without asking for permission. Consult the document(s) and/or contact the copyright holder for additional rights questions and requests.