Show simple item record

Prevention of wound complications following salvage laryngectomy using free vascularized tissue

dc.contributor.authorFung, Kevinen_US
dc.contributor.authorTeknos, Theodoros N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVandenberg, Curtis D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLyden, Teresa H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBradford, Carol R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHogikyan, Norman D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jenniferen_US
dc.contributor.authorPrince, Mark E. P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWolf, Gregory T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChepeha, Douglas B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-09-20T18:31:56Z
dc.date.available2008-09-08T14:25:13Zen_US
dc.date.issued2007-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationFung, Kevin; Teknos, Theodoros N.; Vandenberg, Curtis D.; Lyden, Teresa H.; Bradford, Carol R.; Hogikyan, Norman D.; Kim, Jennifer; Prince, Mark E. P.; Wolf, Gregory T.; Chepeha, Douglas B. (2007)."Prevention of wound complications following salvage laryngectomy using free vascularized tissue." Head & Neck 29(5): 425-430. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/56020>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1043-3074en_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0347en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/56020
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=17274047&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground. Total laryngectomy following radiation therapy or concurrent chemoradiation therapy is associated with unacceptably high complication rates because of wound healing difficulties. With an ever increasing reliance on organ preservation protocols as primary treatment for advanced laryngeal cancer, the surgeon must develop techniques to minimize postoperative complications in salvage laryngectomy surgery. We have developed an approach using free tissue transfer in an effort to improve tissue vascularity, reinforce the pharyngeal suture line, and minimize complications in this difficult patient population. The purpose of this study was to outline our technique and determine the effectiveness of this new approach. Methods. We conducted a retrospective review of a prospective cohort and compared it with a historical group (surgical patients of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)-91-11 trial). Eligibility criteria for this study included patients undergoing salvage total laryngectomy following failed attempts at organ preservation with either high-dose radiotherapy or concurrent chemo/radiation therapy regimen. Patients were excluded if the surgical defect required a skin paddle for pharyngeal closure. The prospective cohort consisted of 14 consecutive patients (10 males, 4 females; mean age, 58 years) who underwent free tissue reinforcement of the pharyngeal suture line following total laryngectomy. The historical comparison group consisted of 27 patients in the concomitant chemoradiotherapy arm of the RTOG-91-11 trial who met the same eligibility criteria (26 males, 1 female; mean age, 57 years) but did not undergo free tissue transfer or other form of suture line reinforcement. Minimum follow-up in both groups was 12 months. Results. The overall pharyngocutaneous fistula rate was similar between groups—4/14 (29%) in the flap group, compared with 8/27 (30%) in the RTOG-91-11 group. There were no major wound complications in the flap group, compared with 4 (4/27, 14.8%) in the RTOG-91-11 group. There were no major fistulas in the flap group, compared with 3/27 (11.1%) in the RTOG-91-11 group. The rate of pharyngeal stricture requiring dilation was 6/14 (42%) in the flap group, compared with 7/27 (25.9%) in the RTOG-91-11 group. In our patients, the rate of tracheoesophageal speech was 14/14 (100%), and complete oral intake was achieved in 13/14 (93%) patients. Voice-Related Quality of Life Measure (V-RQOL) and Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer Patients (PSS-HN) scores suggest that speech and swallowing functions are reasonable following free flap reinforcement. Conclusions. Free vascularized tissue reinforcement of primary pharyngeal closure in salvage laryngectomy following failed organ preservation is effective in preventing major wound complications but did not reduce the overall fistula rate. Fistulas that developed following this technique were relatively small, did not result in exposed major vessels, and were effectively treated with outpatient wound care rather than readmission to the hospital or return to operating room. Speech and swallowing results following this technique were comparable to those following total laryngectomy alone. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 2007en_US
dc.format.extent114629 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherCancer Research, Oncology and Pathologyen_US
dc.titlePrevention of wound complications following salvage laryngectomy using free vascularized tissueen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOtolaryngologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan ; Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.identifier.pmid17274047en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/56020/1/20492_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.20492en_US
dc.identifier.sourceHead & Necken_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.