Show simple item record

The brain tissue response to implanted silicon microelectrode arrays is increased when the device is tethered to the skull

dc.contributor.authorBiran, Royen_US
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Dave C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTresco, Patrick A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-09-20T18:53:11Z
dc.date.available2008-09-08T14:25:12Zen_US
dc.date.issued2007-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationBiran, Roy; Martin, Dave C.; Tresco, Patrick A. (2007)."The brain tissue response to implanted silicon microelectrode arrays is increased when the device is tethered to the skull." Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 82A(1): 169-178. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/56096>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1549-3296en_US
dc.identifier.issn1552-4965en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/56096
dc.description.abstractThe influence of tethering silicon microelectrode arrays on the cortical brain tissue reaction was compared with that of untethered implants placed in the same location by identical means using immunoflourescent methods and cell type specific markers over indwelling periods of 1–4 weeks. Compared with untethered, freely floating implants, tethered microelectrodes elicited significantly greater reactivity to antibodies against ED1 and GFAP over time. Regardless of implantation method or indwelling time, retrieved microelectrodes contained a layer of attached macrophages identified by positive immunoreactivity against ED1. In the tethered condition and in cases where the tissue surrounding untethered implants had the highest levels of ED1+ and GFAP+ immunoreactivity, the neuronal markers for neurofilament 160 and NeuN were reduced. Although the precise mechanisms are unclear, the present study indicates that simply tethering silicon microelectrode arrays to the skull increases the cortical brain tissue response in the recording zone immediately surrounding the microelectrode array, which signals the importance of identifying this important variable when evaluating the tissue response of different device designs, and suggests that untethered or wireless devices may elicit less of a foreign body response. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2007en_US
dc.format.extent731203 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherChemistryen_US
dc.subject.otherPolymer and Materials Scienceen_US
dc.titleThe brain tissue response to implanted silicon microelectrode arrays is increased when the device is tethered to the skullen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiomedical Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumMacromolecular Science and Engineering Center, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThe Keck Center for Tissue Engineering, Department of Bioengineering, College of Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThe Keck Center for Tissue Engineering, Department of Bioengineering, College of Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 ; The Keck Center for Tissue Engineering, Department of Bioengineering, College of Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/56096/1/31138_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.31138en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Biomedical Materials Research Part Aen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.