Show simple item record

Transhiatal esophagectomy for distal and cardia cancers: implications of a positive gastric margin.

dc.contributor.authorDiMusto, Paul D.
dc.contributor.authorOrringer, Mark B.
dc.date.accessioned2008-01-04T19:45:16Z
dc.date.available2008-01-04T19:45:16Z
dc.date.issued2007-06
dc.identifier.citationAnn Thorac Surg. 2007; 83(6):1993-8 <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/57504>
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/57504
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=17532385&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: A common operation for cancer of the esophagus and cardia consists of transhiatal esophagectomy, proximal gastrectomy, and a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. The oncologic adequacy of dividing the stomach 4 to 6 cm distal to palpable tumor is not well documented, and when a positive gastric margin is present on the final pathologic analysis, the appropriate management is not established. This study was undertaken to determine the incidence of a positive gastric margin in these patients and the impact of adjuvant treatment. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 1044 patients undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus or cardia. Twenty (1.9%) had a positive gastric margin on final the pathologic evaluation and met inclusion criteria for this study. RESULTS: Nine patients (45%) received adjuvant therapy consisting of radiation in 3, chemotherapy in 4, or both in 2. Their average postoperative survival was 477 days, compared with 455 days in those not receiving adjuvant therapy (p = 0.898). Local tumor recurrence developed in 1 patient (11%) in the treatment group and in 3 (27%) in the no treatment group (p = 0.386). CONCLUSIONS: A transhiatal esophagectomy and proximal gastrectomy for carcinoma of the distal esophagus and cardia, dividing the stomach 4 to 6 cm from palpable tumor, provides a negative gastric margin in 98% of patients. In the few patients who have a positive gastric margin, 80% die with distant metastases, which would not be influenced by more extensive gastric resection, and in about 20%, local tumor recurrence develops in the intrathoracic stomach, seldom causing dysphagia. Adjuvant therapy for a positive gastric margin neither improves survival nor reduces local tumor recurrence.en_US
dc.format.extent97792 bytes
dc.format.extent99322 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/vnd.ms-excel
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAnnals of Thoracic Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectTranshiatal Esophagectomyen_US
dc.subjectPositive Gastric Marginen_US
dc.titleTranshiatal esophagectomy for distal and cardia cancers: implications of a positive gastric margin.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.typeDataseten_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSurgery and Anesthesiology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSection of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgeryen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid17532385
dc.identifier.pmid17532385en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/57504/2/Dimutso subject db deidentified.xlsen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/57504/1/dimusto.pdfen_US
dc.owningcollnameThoracic Surgery, Section of


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.