Development and Application of a Random Lung Model for Dose Calculations in Radiotherapy.
dc.contributor.author | Liang, Liang | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2008-01-16T15:10:48Z | |
dc.date.available | 2008-01-16T15:10:48Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/57654 | |
dc.description.abstract | Radiotherapy requires accurate dose calculations in the human body, especially in disease sites with large variations of electron density in neighboring tissues, such as the lung. Currently, the lung is modeled by a voxelized geometry interpolated from computed tomography (CT) scans to various resolutions. The simplest such voxelized lung, the atomic mix model, is a homogenized whole lung with a volume averaged bulk density. However, according traditional transport theory, even the relatively fine CT voxelization of the lung is not valid, due to the extremely small mean free path (MFP) of the electrons. The purpose of this thesis is to study the impact of the lung’s heterogeneities on dose calculations in lung treatment planning. We first extend the traditional atomic mix theory for charged particles by approximating the Boltzmann equation for electrons to its Fokker-Planck (FP) limit, and then applying a formal asymptotic analysis to the BFP equation. This analysis raises the length scale for homogenizing a heterogeneous medium from the electron mean free path (MFP) to the much larger electron transport MFP. Then, using the lung’s anatomical data and our new atomic mix theory, we build a realistic 2 1/2-D random lung model. The dose distributions for representative realizations of the random lung model are compared to those from the atomic mix approximation of the random lung model, showing that significant perturbations may occur with small field sizes and large lung structures. We also apply our random lung model to a more realistic lung phantom and investigate the effect of CT resolutions on lung treatment planning. We show that, compared to the reference 1 ×1 mm2 CT resolution, a 2 ×2 mm2 CT resolution is sufficient to voxelize the lung, while significant deviations in dose can be observed with a larger 4×4 mm2 CT resolution. We use the Monte Carlo method extensively in this thesis, to avoid systematic errors caused by inaccurate heterogeneity corrections that occur in approximate clinical dose calculation methods. Finally, we address potential improvements for our random lung model and some possible future applications. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 1373 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 2171686 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | Lung Model | en_US |
dc.subject | Monte Carlo Method | en_US |
dc.subject | Heterogeneity Correction | en_US |
dc.subject | Dose Calculation | en_US |
dc.subject | Atomic Mix | en_US |
dc.title | Development and Application of a Random Lung Model for Dose Calculations in Radiotherapy. | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreename | PhD | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Nuclear Engineering & Radiological Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantor | University of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Larsen, Edward W. | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Balter, James M. | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Chetty, Indrin J. | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Martin, William R. | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Engineering | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/57654/2/lliang_1.pdf | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Dissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.