Mechanisms of Timing Across Tasks and Temporal Intervals.
dc.contributor.author | Bangert, Ashley S. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2008-01-16T15:18:30Z | |
dc.date.available | 2008-01-16T15:18:30Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/57725 | |
dc.description.abstract | This dissertation investigates whether the information-processing instantiation of scalar expectancy theory (SET) is responsible for timing durations that span both the milliseconds and seconds ranges across perceptual and motor timing tasks. A common-timer view predicts that variability increases proportionally with increasing duration in a similar fashion across tasks. We use the coefficient of variation as an estimate of temporal sensitivity, and we perform Weber slope analysis to compare estimates of duration-dependent variance across durations and tasks. Other dependent variables included measures of temporal accuracy and response latency. Experiment 1 investigated whether a common mechanism can account for performance across a range of durations within a temporal reproduction task. The results were inconsistent with a single scalar timer across durations. Experiment 2 involved using endpoint pairs to reduce anchoring effects, a larger number of stimulus durations, and the addition of a similarly structured task that emphasized perception. Temporal reproduction and discrimination tasks were run in different subject groups, and again, the data challenge a single scalar timer within reproduction and point to separate timers for the two tasks. The third experiment examined the similarly structured temporal reproduction and discrimination tasks in a within-subjects design, eliminating the procedural differences between the tasks present in Experiment 2, and allowing for analysis of individual differences. The data again revealed nonlinear timing in the two tasks as well as evidence for task-specific clocks. Overall, these data argue against the possibility of a single scalar timer across durations in motor and perceptual timing and suggest a reformulation of the processes responsible for timing in these task conditions. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 1373 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 2697552 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | Timing | en_US |
dc.subject | Temporal Discrimination | en_US |
dc.subject | Temporal Reproduction | en_US |
dc.subject | Temporal Memory | en_US |
dc.subject | Scalar Expectancy Theory | en_US |
dc.title | Mechanisms of Timing Across Tasks and Temporal Intervals. | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreename | PhD | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Psychology | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantor | University of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Reuter-Lorenz, Patricia A. | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Seidler, Rachael D. | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Aldridge, J Wayne | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Lustig, Cindy Ann | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Meyer, David E. | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Psychology | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/57725/2/abangert_1.pdf | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Dissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.