Show simple item record

Mechanisms of Timing Across Tasks and Temporal Intervals.

dc.contributor.authorBangert, Ashley S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-01-16T15:18:30Z
dc.date.available2008-01-16T15:18:30Z
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/57725
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation investigates whether the information-processing instantiation of scalar expectancy theory (SET) is responsible for timing durations that span both the milliseconds and seconds ranges across perceptual and motor timing tasks. A common-timer view predicts that variability increases proportionally with increasing duration in a similar fashion across tasks. We use the coefficient of variation as an estimate of temporal sensitivity, and we perform Weber slope analysis to compare estimates of duration-dependent variance across durations and tasks. Other dependent variables included measures of temporal accuracy and response latency. Experiment 1 investigated whether a common mechanism can account for performance across a range of durations within a temporal reproduction task. The results were inconsistent with a single scalar timer across durations. Experiment 2 involved using endpoint pairs to reduce anchoring effects, a larger number of stimulus durations, and the addition of a similarly structured task that emphasized perception. Temporal reproduction and discrimination tasks were run in different subject groups, and again, the data challenge a single scalar timer within reproduction and point to separate timers for the two tasks. The third experiment examined the similarly structured temporal reproduction and discrimination tasks in a within-subjects design, eliminating the procedural differences between the tasks present in Experiment 2, and allowing for analysis of individual differences. The data again revealed nonlinear timing in the two tasks as well as evidence for task-specific clocks. Overall, these data argue against the possibility of a single scalar timer across durations in motor and perceptual timing and suggest a reformulation of the processes responsible for timing in these task conditions.en_US
dc.format.extent1373 bytes
dc.format.extent2697552 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectTimingen_US
dc.subjectTemporal Discriminationen_US
dc.subjectTemporal Reproductionen_US
dc.subjectTemporal Memoryen_US
dc.subjectScalar Expectancy Theoryen_US
dc.titleMechanisms of Timing Across Tasks and Temporal Intervals.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePsychologyen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberReuter-Lorenz, Patricia A.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberSeidler, Rachael D.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberAldridge, J Wayneen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberLustig, Cindy Annen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberMeyer, David E.en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/57725/2/abangert_1.pdfen_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.