Show simple item record

Nodule heterogeneity as shown by size differences between the targeted nodule and the tumor in thyroidectomy specimen

dc.contributor.authorSiddiqui, Masood A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGriffith, Kent A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMichael, Claire W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPu, Robert T.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-03-06T19:08:54Z
dc.date.available2009-03-04T14:20:46Zen_US
dc.date.issued2008-02-25en_US
dc.identifier.citationSiddiqui, Masood A.; Griffith, Kent A.; Michael, Claire W.; Pu, Robert T. (2008). "Nodule heterogeneity as shown by size differences between the targeted nodule and the tumor in thyroidectomy specimen." Cancer 114(1): 27-33. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/58022>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0008-543Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0142en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/58022
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=18085634&dopt=citation
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND. Missed papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) diagnoses on fine-needle aspiration (FNA) can result from many causes. To the authors' knowledge, the issue of whether the detection of PTC is correlated with nodule heterogeneity has not been studied to date. METHODS. The authors identified all thyroidectomy specimens with a diagnosis of PTC that had undergone at least 1 prior FNA in the study institution between 1998 and 2003. The tumor size at the time of the resection, the ultrasound (US)-determined nodule size, and other parameters were compared between the 2 groups in which PTC was or was not diagnosed on FNA. RESULTS. Of a total of 89 specimens, 47 were diagnosed on FNA with an average tumor size of 1.7 cm and an US-determined nodule size of 2.1 cm (a difference of 0.4 cm). Forty-two specimens with a smaller average tumor size of 0.9 cm ( P <.0001) and a US-determined nodule size of 2.4 cm (a difference of 1.5 cm) were missed. The differences with regard to the US-determined nodule size and tumor size between the 2 groups were significant (0.4 cm vs 1.5 cm; P < .0001). In the missed group, 29 specimens were found to have PTC foci that measured ≤1.0 cm and 26 had a reasonable size difference (RSD; defined as a PTC size outside the range of ±50% of the US-determined nodule size) as the indicator of the mixed nature of nodules targeted for FNA, whereas in the diagnostic group, 9 foci measured ≤1.0 cm and 6 had RSD. There was no cytologic evidence with which to render a diagnosis of PTC on further review in the missed group. CONCLUSIONS. The major reason for a missed diagnosis of PTC on FNA is because of inadequate tumor sampling due to the heterogeneity of the nodule targeted for FNA. This is illustrated by the RSD noted between the targeted nodule and the actual PTC tumor focus in the resection specimen. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2008. © 2007 American Cancer Society.en_US
dc.format.extent169390 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherCancer Research, Oncology and Pathologyen_US
dc.titleNodule heterogeneity as shown by size differences between the targeted nodule and the tumor in thyroidectomy specimenen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumBiostatistics Unit, University of Michigan, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan ; Fax: (734) 763-4095 ; Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Hospitals, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, AnnArbor, MI 48109-0054en_US
dc.identifier.pmid18085634
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/58022/1/23253_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23253en_US
dc.identifier.sourceCanceren_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.