Show simple item record

Examining the Relationship Between Leisure-Time Physical Activity and the Risk of Colon and Breast Cancer: A Methodological Review and Meta-Analyses.

dc.contributor.authorHerman, Christopher W.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-05-08T19:02:44Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2008-05-08T19:02:44Z
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.date.submitteden_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/58416
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The objective of this study was to review the methodology and analyze the existing data examining the relationship between leisure-time physical activity and the risk of colon and breast cancer. Methods: Methodological differences (participant characteristics, length of time physical activity was measured, categorizations of quantified physical activity, and assessment instrumentation used to record activity) among studies of activity and cancer risk were reviewed and potential confounding was estimated by calculating the percent difference between multivariate-adjusted effect measures and unadjusted effect measures. A series of meta-analyses were completed. Studies quantifying activity using the Compendium of Physical Activities were included in the primary meta-analyses of colon and breast cancer risk. Subjects from all studies were combined and categorized into low, moderate, and high amounts of weekly activity. Moderate and high groups were compared to the low reference group. Results: Percent differences between adjusted and unadjusted effect measures ranged from 0-31% across all physical activity categories for colon cancer studies and 0-21% for breast cancer studies, with one study reporting a larger difference for each set of analyses (Tang et al., 1999 – 93%; Patel et al., 2003 –64%, respectively). Combined effect measures for high versus low activity ranged from 0.524 (95% CI = 0.348-0.788; p = 0.002; Males) to 0.673 (95% CI = 0.474-0.956; p = 0.027; females) for colon cancer risk. For breast cancer risk, effect measures for high versus low activity were 0.832 (95% CI = 0.747-0.926; p = 0.001) for pre- and postmenopausal females combined, 0.820 (95% CI = 0.584-1.151; p = 0.251) for premenopausal females, and 0.868 (95% CI = 0.754-0.999) for postmenopausal females. Conclusions: Higher amounts of leisure-time physical activity were associated with a reduced risk of male and female colon cancer and postmenopausal breast cancer. Future studies of the relationship between physical activity and cancer risk should adhere to a standardized questionnaire for assessing types of activity, standard time frame for measuring activity, and quantification of the amount of activity likely to be protective, to develop a better understanding of the effects of leisure-time physical activity on cancer risk throughout the lifespan.en_US
dc.format.extent6244919 bytes
dc.format.extent1373 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectLeisure-Time Physical Activity and Colon Canceren_US
dc.subjectLeisure-Time Physical Activity and Breast Canceren_US
dc.titleExamining the Relationship Between Leisure-Time Physical Activity and the Risk of Colon and Breast Cancer: A Methodological Review and Meta-Analyses.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineKinesiologyen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberEdington, Dee W.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberWelch, Kathleen B.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberErdmann, Christineen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberGross, M. Melissaen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelKinesiology and Sportsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/58416/1/hermanch_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.