Show simple item record

Truck mirrors, fields of view, and serious truck crashes

dc.contributor.authorBlower, Daniel Fredericken_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-06-11T15:49:45Z
dc.date.available2008-07-14T17:59:27Zen_US
dc.date.issued2007-06
dc.identifier99830en_US
dc.identifier.otherUMTRI-2007-25en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/58728
dc.description.abstractThe driver’s direct field of view in a truck is significantly more restricted than that in other vehicles, especially in passenger vehicles. The federal standard that regulates mirror systems on trucks is Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 111, which requires only a planar mirror on each side of the cab with an area of at least 323 square centimeters. This report analyzes currently available data to examine the traffic safety problems that may be related to truck mirror systems. Analysis of crash data, measurements of fields of view, and observational data on the variety and distribution of mirror configurations in the truck population suggest a need for improved driver vision to address specific truck crash types. “Mirror-relevant” crash types are defined, identifying crashes in which the truck driver would likely need to use mirrors to maneuver safely. These crash types include lane change/merge (LCM) left, LCM right, left turn with the conflict vehicle approaching from the rear, right turn with the conflict vehicle approaching from the rear, start-up with a pedestrian/nonmotorist in front of the vehicle, and backing. Mirror-relevant crashes account for almost 20 percent of all truck crash involvements. LCM right crashes occurred over four times more frequently than LCM left crashes. Similarly, turn-atintersection crashes in which the conflict comes from the rear are over four times more frequent as right turns than as left. These results illustrate a safety problem in the area where the driver’s view is more restricted. Observational data indicate that about 70 percent of trucks with conventional cabs have right fender mounted mirrors, which can fill in the driver’s view along the front right side. Preliminary results from the Large Truck Crash Causation Study (LTCCS), the first to include mirror configuration, suggest that trucks without a right fender mirror may be significantly overinvolved in crashes.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Michigan Industry Affiliation Program for Human Factors in Transportation Safetyen_US
dc.format.extent24en_US
dc.format.extent462831 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Instituteen_US
dc.subject.otherTrucksen_US
dc.subject.otherMirrorsen_US
dc.subject.otherSide-View Mirrorsen_US
dc.subject.otherAccident Types/ Accident Classificationen_US
dc.subject.otherAccident Severityen_US
dc.subject.otherField of Viewen_US
dc.subject.otherData Analysisen_US
dc.subject.otherDatabases/ Data Banksen_US
dc.subject.otherFatal Accident Filesen_US
dc.titleTruck mirrors, fields of view, and serious truck crashesen_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelTransportation
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineering
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/58728/1/99830.pdf
dc.owningcollnameTransportation Research Institute (UMTRI)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.