JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Disaggregation and Targeting of Universal Service Support
Austin, Robert F.; Childers, Porter E.
2002-12-21
Citation:Austin, Robert F. and Childers, Porter E. "Disaggregation and Targeting nof Universal Service Support." Solstice: An Electronic Journal of Geography and Mathematics, Volume XIII, Number 2. Ann Arbor: Institute of Mathematical Geography, 2002. Persistent URL (URI): http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/60280
Abstract: Introduction
The actual cost of providing telecommunications services in rural America is generally
higher, per customer, than is the cost of providing these services in urban areas. This
difference is due in part to the lower density of population of rural areas. Rural
carriers, in contrast to urban carriers, have fewer customers to share basic fixed costs
(for example, switches) and these customers are separated by greater distances,
increasing outside plant costs, than are their urban counterparts. The disparity in costs
is also related to the economies of scale and economies of skill enjoyed by large urban
carriers that are not available to rural carriers. For example, the Federal
Communications Commission’s forward-looking economic cost model shows a cost of
$866.27, without adjustment for overhead costs, to provide a local loop in a Wyoming
wire center, compared to a cost of $9.97 to provide a local loop in a New York City
wire center.